Maguire Melissa J, Jackson Cerian F, Marson Anthony G, Nolan Sarah J
Department of Neurology, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 19;7(7):CD011792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011792.pub2.
Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is defined as sudden, unexpected, witnessed or unwitnessed, non-traumatic or non-drowning death of people with epilepsy, with or without evidence of a seizure, excluding documented status epilepticus and in whom postmortem examination does not reveal a structural or toxicological cause for death. SUDEP has a reported incidence of 1 to 2 per 1000 patient years and represents the most common epilepsy-related cause of death. The presence and frequency of generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), male sex, early age of seizure onset, duration of epilepsy, and polytherapy are all predictors of risk of SUDEP. The exact pathophysiology of SUDEP is currently unknown, although GTCS-induced cardiac, respiratory, and brainstem dysfunction appears likely. Appropriately chosen antiepileptic drug treatment can render around 70% of patients free of all seizures. However, around one-third will remain drug refractory despite polytherapy. Continuing seizures place patients at risk of SUDEP, depression, and reduced quality of life. Preventative strategies for SUDEP include reducing the occurrence of GTCS by timely referral for presurgical evaluation in people with lesional epilepsy and advice on lifestyle measures; detecting cardiorespiratory distress through clinical observation and seizure, respiratory, and heart rate monitoring devices; preventing airway obstruction through nocturnal supervision and safety pillows; reducing central hypoventilation through physical stimulation and enhancing serotonergic mechanisms of respiratory regulation using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); reducing adenosine and endogenous opioid-induced brain and brainstem depression.
To assess the effectiveness of interventions in preventing SUDEP in people with epilepsy by synthesising evidence from randomised controlled trials of interventions and cohort and case-control non-randomised studies.
We searched the following databases: Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 11, 2015) via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online (CRSO); MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 onwards); SCOPUS (1823 onwards); PsycINFO (EBSCOhost, 1887 onwards); CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost, 1937 onwards); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We used no language restrictions. The date of the last search was 12 November 2015. We checked the reference lists of retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies and contacted lead study authors for any relevant unpublished material. We identified duplicate studies by screening reports according to title, authors' names, location, and medical institute, omitting any duplicated studies. We identified any grey literature studies published in the last five years by searching: Zetoc database; ISI Proceedings; International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE) congress proceedings database; International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) congress proceedings database; abstract books of symposia and congresses, meeting abstracts, and research reports.
We aimed to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster-RCTs; prospective non-randomised cohort controlled and uncontrolled studies; and case-control studies of adults and children with epilepsy receiving an intervention for the prevention of SUDEP. Types of interventions included: early versus delayed pre-surgical evaluation for lesional epilepsy; educational programmes; seizure-monitoring devices; safety pillows; nocturnal supervision; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); opiate antagonists; and adenosine antagonists.
We aimed to collect data on study design factors and participant demographics for included studies. The primary outcome of interest was the number of deaths from SUDEP. Secondary outcomes included: number of other deaths (unrelated to SUDEP); change in mean depression and anxiety scores (as defined within the study); clinically important change in quality of life, that is any change in quality of life score (average and endpoint) according to validated quality of life scales; and number of hospital attendances for seizures.
We identified 582 records from the databases and search strategies. We found 10 further records by searching other resources (handsearching). We removed 211 duplicate records and screened 381 records (title and abstract) for inclusion in the review. We excluded 364 records based on the title and abstract and assessed 17 full-text articles. We excluded 15 studies: eight studies did not assess interventions to prevent SUDEP; five studies measured sensitivity of devices to detect GTCS but did not directly measure SUDEP; and two studies assessed risk factors for SUDEP but not interventions for preventing SUDEP. One listed study is awaiting classification.We included one case-control study at serious risk of bias within a qualitative analysis in this review. This study of 154 cases of SUDEP and 616 controls ascertained a protective effect for the presence of nocturnal supervision (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 0.53) and when a supervising person shared the same bedroom or when special precautions, for example a listening device, were used (unadjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.82). This effect was independent of seizure control. Non-SUDEP deaths; changes to anxiety, depression, and quality of life; and number of hospital attendances were not reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found very low-quality evidence of a preventative effect for nocturnal supervision against SUDEP. Further research is required to identify the effectiveness of other current interventions, for example seizure detection devices, safety pillows, SSRIs, early surgical evaluation, educational programmes, and opiate and adenosine antagonists in preventing SUDEP in people with epilepsy.
癫痫性猝死(SUDEP)被定义为癫痫患者突然、意外、有目击者或无目击者、非创伤性或非溺水死亡,无论是否有癫痫发作证据,排除已记录的癫痫持续状态,且尸检未发现结构性或毒理学死因。据报道,SUDEP的发病率为每1000患者年1至2例,是癫痫相关死亡的最常见原因。全身强直阵挛发作(GTCS)的存在和频率、男性、癫痫发作起始的早期年龄、癫痫持续时间以及联合治疗都是SUDEP风险的预测因素。尽管GTCS诱发的心脏、呼吸和脑干功能障碍似乎很可能,但SUDEP的确切病理生理学目前尚不清楚。适当选择的抗癫痫药物治疗可使约70%的患者无癫痫发作。然而,尽管进行了联合治疗,仍有约三分之一的患者药物难治。持续发作使患者面临SUDEP、抑郁和生活质量下降的风险。SUDEP的预防策略包括通过对有病灶性癫痫的患者及时转诊进行术前评估和提供生活方式建议来减少GTCS的发生;通过临床观察以及癫痫发作、呼吸和心率监测设备检测心肺窘迫;通过夜间监护和安全枕头预防气道阻塞;通过物理刺激减少中枢性通气不足,并使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)增强呼吸调节的5-羟色胺能机制;减少腺苷和内源性阿片类物质引起的脑和脑干抑制。
通过综合干预措施的随机对照试验以及队列和病例对照非随机研究的证据,评估干预措施在预防癫痫患者SUDEP方面的有效性。
我们检索了以下数据库:Cochrane癫痫组专业注册库;通过在线研究注册库(CRSO)检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,2015年第11期);MEDLINE(Ovid,1946年起);SCOPUS(1823年起);PsycINFO(EBSCOhost,1887年起);CINAHL Plus(EBSCOhost,1937年起);ClinicalTrials.gov;以及世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)。我们没有设置语言限制。最后一次检索日期为2015年11月12日。我们检查了检索到的研究的参考文献列表,以获取相关研究的其他报告,并联系主要研究作者获取任何相关的未发表材料。我们根据标题、作者姓名、地点和医疗机构筛选报告来识别重复研究,省略任何重复的研究。我们通过搜索以下资源来识别过去五年发表的任何灰色文献研究:Zetoc数据库;ISI会议录;国际癫痫局(IBE)大会会议录数据库;国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)大会会议录数据库;研讨会和大会的摘要书籍、会议摘要和研究报告。
我们旨在纳入随机对照试验(RCT)、半随机对照试验和整群随机对照试验;前瞻性非随机队列对照和非对照研究;以及对接受预防SUDEP干预措施的癫痫成人和儿童进行的病例对照研究。干预措施类型包括:对病灶性癫痫进行早期与延迟术前评估;教育项目;癫痫发作监测设备;安全枕头;夜间监护;选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI);阿片类拮抗剂;以及腺苷拮抗剂。
我们旨在收集纳入研究的研究设计因素和参与者人口统计学数据。感兴趣的主要结局是SUDEP死亡人数。次要结局包括:其他死亡人数(与SUDEP无关);平均抑郁和焦虑评分的变化(如研究中所定义);生活质量的临床重要变化,即根据经过验证的生活质量量表得出的生活质量评分(平均值和终点)的任何变化;以及癫痫发作的住院就诊次数。
我们通过数据库和检索策略识别出582条记录。通过搜索其他资源(手工检索)又找到10条记录。我们删除了211条重复记录,并筛选了381条记录(标题和摘要)以纳入综述。我们根据标题和摘要排除了364条记录,并评估了17篇全文文章。我们排除了15项研究:8项研究未评估预防SUDEP的干预措施;5项研究测量了检测GTCS的设备的敏感性,但未直接测量SUDEP;2项研究评估了SUDEP的危险因素,但未评估预防SUDEP的干预措施。一项列出的研究正在等待分类我们在本综述的定性分析中纳入了一项存在严重偏倚风险的病例对照研究。这项对154例SUDEP病例和616例对照的研究确定了夜间监护的保护作用(未调整优势比(OR)为0.34,95%置信区间(CI)为0.22至0.53),以及当有监督人员共用同一卧室或使用特殊预防措施(如监听设备)时的保护作用(未调整OR为0.41,95%CI为0.20至0.82)。这种作用与癫痫控制无关。未报告非SUDEP死亡情况;焦虑、抑郁和生活质量的变化;以及住院就诊次数。
我们发现夜间监护对预防SUDEP有预防作用的证据质量非常低。需要进一步研究以确定其他当前干预措施(如癫痫发作检测设备、安全枕头、SSRI、早期手术评估、教育项目以及阿片类和腺苷拮抗剂)在预防癫痫患者SUDEP方面的有效性。