Kordbacheh F, Bhatia N, Farah C S
Oral Oncology Research Program, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Qld, Australia.
Australian Centre for Oral Oncology Research & Education, School of Dentistry, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Oral Dis. 2016 May;22(4):285-96. doi: 10.1111/odi.12438. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
We aimed to elucidate the molecular pathways associated with fluorescence properties of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) visualised under direct tissue autofluorescence (VELscope(™)).
Forty-two oral mucosal biopsies correlated with clinical fluorescence characteristics were categorised based on histopathological diagnosis. Four oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), 15 oral epithelial dysplasia (OED), nine oral lichen planus (OLP) and 14 oral epithelial hyperplasia (OEH) presenting with three fluorescence patterns including retained fluorescence (RF), loss of fluorescence (LAF) with blanching (LB) and LAF with no blanching (LNB) were assessed. Relative gene expression was measured through RNA sequencing.
Although each lesion type had a specific set of histology-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs), all tested samples shared a number of DEGs, and we could not identify a discriminatory component between histological groups. Gene ontology enrichment revealed LAF in OEH was mostly due to changes in inflammation, cell cycle regulation and apoptosis, while in OED was due to inflammation, angiogenesis and extracellular matrix remodelling. Inflammatory reactions were associated with diascopic fluorescence (DF) for both OEH and OED.
Uncovering the molecular mechanisms underlying LAF and DF may lead to reduction in the number of false-positive and false-negative findings and improve the efficacy and utility of VELscope(™).
我们旨在阐明与在直接组织自体荧光(VELscope™)下可视化的口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMD)荧光特性相关的分子途径。
根据组织病理学诊断,对42例与临床荧光特征相关的口腔黏膜活检标本进行分类。评估了4例口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)、15例口腔上皮发育异常(OED)、9例口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)和14例口腔上皮增生(OEH),这些病变呈现出三种荧光模式,包括保留荧光(RF)、伴有变白的荧光丧失(LAF)(LB)和不伴有变白的荧光丧失(LNB)。通过RNA测序测量相对基因表达。
尽管每种病变类型都有一组特定的与组织学相关的差异表达基因(DEG),但所有测试样本都有一些共同的DEG,并且我们无法在组织学组之间识别出一个区分性成分。基因本体富集分析显示,OEH中的LAF主要归因于炎症、细胞周期调控和细胞凋亡的变化,而在OED中则归因于炎症、血管生成和细胞外基质重塑。炎症反应与OEH和OED的透照荧光(DF)相关。
揭示LAF和DF背后的分子机制可能会减少假阳性和假阴性结果的数量,并提高VELscope™的有效性和实用性。