Department of Electronic Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 4;15(2):e0228132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228132. eCollection 2020.
Oral cancer is one of the most common diseases globally. Conventional oral examination and histopathological examination are the two main clinical methods for diagnosing oral cancer early. VELscope is an oral cancer-screening device that exploited autofluorescence. It yields inconsistent results when used to differentiate between normal, premalignant and malignant lesions. We develop a new method to increase the accuracy of differentiation.
Five samples (images) of each of 21 normal mucosae, as well as 31 premalignant and 16 malignant lesions of the tongue and buccal mucosa were collected under both white light and autofluorescence (VELscope, 400-460 nm wavelength). The images were developed using an iPod (Apple, Atlanta Georgia, USA).
The normalized intensity and standard deviation of intensity were calculated to classify image pixels from the region of interest (ROI). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) classifiers were used. The performance of both of the classifiers was evaluated with respect to accuracy, precision, and recall. These parameters were used for multiclass classification. The accuracy rate of LDA with un-normalized data was increased by 2% and 14% and that of QDA was increased by 16% and 25% for the tongue and buccal mucosa, respectively.
The QDA algorithm outperforms the LDA classifier in the analysis of autofluorescence images with respect to all of the standard evaluation parameters.
口腔癌是全球最常见的疾病之一。常规口腔检查和组织病理学检查是早期诊断口腔癌的两种主要临床方法。VELscope 是一种利用自发荧光的口腔癌筛查设备,在区分正常、癌前病变和恶性病变方面的结果不一致。我们开发了一种新方法来提高区分的准确性。
收集了 21 例正常舌和颊黏膜的 5 个样本(图像),以及 31 例癌前病变和 16 例恶性病变的舌和颊黏膜样本,分别在白光和自发荧光(VELscope,400-460nm 波长)下进行。使用 iPod(美国亚特兰大佐治亚州的苹果公司)开发图像。
为了对感兴趣区域(ROI)的图像像素进行分类,计算了归一化强度和强度标准差。使用线性判别分析(LDA)和二次判别分析(QDA)分类器。使用准确性、精确性和召回率评估两种分类器的性能。这些参数用于多类分类。对于舌和颊黏膜,未归一化数据的 LDA 准确性分别提高了 2%和 14%,QDA 准确性分别提高了 16%和 25%。
与所有标准评估参数相比,QDA 算法在分析自发荧光图像方面优于 LDA 分类器。