Simpson Ain, Laham Simon M, Fiske Alan Page
a Ohio University.
b University of Melbourne.
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov-Dec;156(6):594-609. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1140118. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
Morality primarily serves social-relational functions. However, little research in moral psychology investigates how relational factors impact moral judgment, and a theoretically grounded approach to such investigations is lacking. We used Relational Models Theory and Moral Foundations Theory to explore how varying actor-victim relationships impacts judgment of different types of moral violations. Across three studies, using a diverse range of moral violations and varying the experimental design, relational context substantially influenced third-party judgment of moral violations, and typically independent of several factors strongly associated with moral judgment. Results lend novel but mixed support to Relationship Regulation Theory and provide some novel implications for Moral Foundations Theory. These studies highlight the importance of relational factors in moral psychology and provide guidelines for exploring how relational factors might shape moral judgment.
道德主要发挥社会关系功能。然而,道德心理学中很少有研究探讨关系因素如何影响道德判断,并且缺乏对此类研究的理论基础方法。我们运用关系模型理论和道德基础理论来探究不同的行为者 - 受害者关系如何影响对不同类型道德违规行为的判断。在三项研究中,我们使用了各种各样的道德违规行为并改变了实验设计,关系背景极大地影响了第三方对道德违规行为的判断,并且通常独立于与道德判断密切相关的几个因素。研究结果为关系调节理论提供了新颖但喜忧参半的支持,并为道德基础理论提供了一些新颖的启示。这些研究凸显了关系因素在道德心理学中的重要性,并为探索关系因素如何塑造道德判断提供了指导方针。