Suppr超能文献

陶瓷自锁托槽的尺寸精度及理论扭转间隙估计

Dimensional accuracy of ceramic self-ligating brackets and estimates of theoretical torsional play.

作者信息

Lee Youngran, Lee Dong-Yul, Kim Yoon-Ji R

机构信息

a  Student, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

b  Professor and Chair, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):804-9. doi: 10.2319/092415-647.1. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the dimensional accuracies of some commonly used ceramic self-ligation brackets and the amount of torsional play in various bracket-archwire combinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four types of 0.022-inch slot ceramic self-ligating brackets (upper right central incisor), three types of 0.018-inch ceramic self-ligating brackets (upper right central incisor), and three types of rectangular archwires (0.016 × 0.022-inch beta-titanium [TMA] (Ormco, Orange, Calif), 0.016 × 0.022-inch stainless steel [SS] (Ortho Technology, Tampa, Fla), and 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS (Ortho Technology)) were measured using a stereomicroscope to determine slot widths and wire cross-sectional dimensions. The mean acquired dimensions of the brackets and wires were applied to an equation devised by Meling to estimate torsional play angle (γ).

RESULTS

In all bracket systems, the slot tops were significantly wider than the slot bases (P < .001), yielding a divergent slot profile. Clarity-SLs (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) showed the greatest divergence among the 0.022-inch brackets, and Clippy-Cs (Tomy, Futaba, Fukushima, Japan) among the 0.018-inch brackets. The Damon Clear (Ormco) bracket had the smallest dimensional error (0.542%), whereas the 0.022-inch Empower Clear (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wis) bracket had the largest (3.585%).

CONCLUSIONS

The largest amount of theoretical play is observed using the Empower Clear (American Orthodontics) 0.022-inch bracket combined with the 0.016 × 0.022-inch TMA wire (Ormco), whereas the least amount occurs using the 0.018 Clippy-C (Tomy) combined with 0.016 × 0.022-inch SS wire (Ortho Technology).

摘要

目的

确定一些常用陶瓷自锁托槽的尺寸精度以及各种托槽 - 弓丝组合中的扭转间隙量。

材料与方法

使用体视显微镜测量四种类型的0.022英寸槽沟陶瓷自锁托槽(右上中切牙)、三种类型的0.018英寸陶瓷自锁托槽(右上中切牙)以及三种类型的矩形弓丝(0.016×0.022英寸β - 钛丝 [TMA](奥美科公司,加利福尼亚州奥兰治)、0.016×0.022英寸不锈钢丝 [SS](正畸科技公司,佛罗里达州坦帕)和0.019×0.025英寸不锈钢丝(正畸科技公司)),以确定槽沟宽度和弓丝横截面尺寸。将获得的托槽和弓丝的平均尺寸应用于梅林设计的方程式,以估计扭转间隙角(γ)。

结果

在所有托槽系统中,槽沟顶部明显比槽沟底部宽(P < 0.001),形成发散的槽沟轮廓。在0.022英寸托槽中,Clarity - SLs(3M Unitek公司,加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚)的发散最大;在0.018英寸托槽中,Clippy - Cs(日本福岛双叶株式会社,富田)的发散最大。Damon Clear(奥美科)托槽的尺寸误差最小(0.542%),而0.022英寸的Empower Clear(美国正畸公司,威斯康星州希博伊根)托槽的尺寸误差最大(3.585%)。

结论

使用Empower Clear(美国正畸公司)0.022英寸托槽与0.016×0.022英寸TMA丝(奥美科)组合时,理论间隙量最大;而使用0.018 Clippy - C(日本福岛双叶株式会社)与0.016×0.022英寸不锈钢丝(正畸科技公司)组合时,间隙量最小。

相似文献

1
Dimensional accuracy of ceramic self-ligating brackets and estimates of theoretical torsional play.
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):804-9. doi: 10.2319/092415-647.1. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
2
Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00501-8.
3
Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):395-402. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00504-3.
6
Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems.
J Orthod. 2015 Jun;42(2):103-13. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000126. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Apr;147(4 Suppl):S101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.024.
9
Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan;149(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.026.
10
Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):201-10. doi: 10.2319/080508-352.1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Self-ligating brackets increase treatment efficiency.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jan;143(1):10-8, 11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.011.
4
Self-ligation esthetic brackets with low frictional resistance.
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):188-94. doi: 10.2319/110608-565.1.
5
Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):276.e1-12; discussion 276-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.020.
7
Anchorage control in bioprogressive vs straight-wire treatment.
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):987-92. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[987:ACIBVS]2.0.CO;2.
8
An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets--are standards as expected?
Angle Orthod. 2004 Aug;74(4):450-3. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0450:AEOSSI>2.0.CO;2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验