Suppr超能文献

正畸托槽槽沟尺寸的评估——是否符合预期标准?

An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets--are standards as expected?

作者信息

Cash A C, Good S A, Curtis R V, McDonald F

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, GKT Dental Institute, Kings College, London, UK.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2004 Aug;74(4):450-3. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0450:AEOSSI>2.0.CO;2.

Abstract

The slots of five upper left central incisor brackets from 11 commercially available bracket systems (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif: Twin Torque Roth, Clarity MBT, and Victory Series MBT; Dentarum, Pforzheim, Germany: Discovery Roth (0.56 mm) and Elegance Plastic Roth; Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany: Mini Mono MBT; TP LaPorte, Indiana: Nu-Edge Roth and Mxi Advant-Edge Roth; Ormco Corp., Orange, Calif: Damon II SL Roth; Ortho Organizers, San Marcos, Calif: Elite Mini Opti-MIM Roth and Elite Mini Opti-MIM MBT) were measured in the 0.022-inch (0.5588 mm) dimension. Measurements were taken after operator calibration, and a digital readout was produced. Results indicate that all bracket slots are oversized. Three bracket systems slots (Twin Torque, Clarity, and Mini Mono) were within 5% (+/-1.08, 1.655, 1.75) of their stated dimensions with essentially parallel slot walls. The Elegance Plastic slot was parallel sided but oversized by 12% (+/-1.15). The geometry of bracket slots was also variable. The Victory Series slot was slightly divergent with the top oversized by 6% (+/-1.035). The Nu-Edge slot was divergent and slot top oversized by 14% (+/-1.32). The Mxi Advant-Edge, Damon II SL, Elite Mini Opti-MIM Roth, and MBT were all convergent, and the base of the Damon slot was oversized by 17% (+/-1.79). The Discovery bracket was convergent, and the slot base was oversized by 24% (+/-1.255), which was the largest recorded variance. This bracket also had a 7% difference between the widths of the slot top and the base. Inaccurate machining of bracket slot dimensions and the use of undersized archwires may directly and adversely affect three-dimensional tooth positioning.

摘要

对11种市售托槽系统(3M Unitek,位于加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚:双转矩Roth、Clarity MBT和Victory系列MBT;德国普福尔茨海姆的Dentarum:Discovery Roth(0.56毫米)和Elegance Plastic Roth;德国普福尔茨海姆的Forestadent:Mini Mono MBT;印第安纳州拉波特的TP:Nu-Edge Roth和Mxi Advant-Edge Roth;加利福尼亚州奥兰治的Ormco Corp.:Damon II SL Roth;加利福尼亚州圣马科斯的Ortho Organizers:Elite Mini Opti-MIM Roth和Elite Mini Opti-MIM MBT)中5个左上中切牙托槽的槽沟在0.022英寸(0.5588毫米)尺寸下进行了测量。测量在操作人员校准后进行,并生成数字读数。结果表明,所有托槽槽沟尺寸均偏大。三种托槽系统的槽沟(双转矩、Clarity和Mini Mono)在其标称尺寸的5%范围内(±1.08、1.655、1.75),槽壁基本平行。Elegance Plastic槽沟两侧平行,但尺寸偏大12%(±1.15)。托槽槽沟的几何形状也各不相同。Victory系列槽沟略有发散,顶部尺寸偏大6%(±1.035)。Nu-Edge槽沟发散,槽顶尺寸偏大14%(±1.32)。Mxi Advant-Edge、Damon II SL、Elite Mini Opti-MIM Roth和MBT均为收敛型,Damon槽沟底部尺寸偏大17%(±1.79)。Discovery托槽为收敛型,槽沟底部尺寸偏大24%(±1.255),这是记录到的最大偏差。该托槽槽顶和底部宽度之间也有7%的差异。托槽槽沟尺寸加工不准确以及使用尺寸过小的弓丝可能会直接并对三维牙齿定位产生不利影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验