Montasser Mona A, Keilig Ludger, El-Bialy Tarek, Reimann Susanne, Jäger Andreas, Bourauel Christoph
Associate professor, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
Senior researcher, Department of Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Apr;147(4 Suppl):S101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.024.
Our objective was to investigate the effect of archwire cross-section increases on the levels of force applied to teeth during complex malalignment correction with various archwire-bracket combinations using an experimental biomechanical setup.
The study comprised 3 types of orthodontic brackets: (1) conventional ligating brackets (Victory Series [3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif] and Mini-Taurus [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo]), (2) self-ligating brackets (SmartClip, a passive self-ligating bracket [3M Unitek]; and Time3 [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo] and SPEED [Strite Industries, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada], both active self-ligating brackets), and (3) a conventional low-friction bracket (Synergy [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics]). All brackets had a nominal 0.022-in slot size. The brackets were combined with 0.014-in and 0.016-in titanium memory wires, Therma-Ti archwires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wis). The archwires were tied to the conventional brackets with both stainless steel ligatures of size 0.010-in and elastomeric rings. A malocclusion of the maxillary central incisor displaced 2 mm gingivally (x-axis) and 2 mm labially (z-axis) was simulated.
The forces recorded when using the 0.014-in archwires ranged from 1.7 ± 0.1 to 5.0 ± 0.3 N in the x-axis direction, and from 1.2 ± 0.1 to 5.5 ± 0.3 N in the z-axis direction. When we used the 0.016-in archwires, the forces ranged from 2.6 ± 0.1 to 6.0 ± 0.3 N in the x-axis direction, and from 2.0 ± 0.2 to 6.0 ± 0.4 N in the z-axis direction. Overall, the increases ranged from 16.0% to 120.0% in the x-axis and from 10.4% to 130.0% in the z-axis directions.
Increasing the cross section of the wire increased the force level invariably with all brackets. Wires of size 0.014 in produced relatively high force levels, and the force level increased with 0.016-in wires.
我们的目的是使用实验性生物力学装置,研究在复杂牙列不齐矫治过程中,弓丝横截面增加对不同弓丝-托槽组合施加于牙齿的力水平的影响。
该研究包括3种类型的正畸托槽:(1)传统结扎托槽(胜利系列[3M Unitek,蒙罗维亚,加利福尼亚州]和迷你金牛座[落基山正畸,丹佛,科罗拉多州]),(2)自锁托槽(SmartClip,一种被动自锁托槽[3M Unitek];以及Time3[落基山正畸,丹佛,科罗拉多州]和SPEED[斯特赖特工业公司,安大略省剑桥,加拿大],均为主动自锁托槽),和(3)传统低摩擦托槽(协同[落基山正畸])。所有托槽的标称槽尺寸为0.022英寸。这些托槽与0.014英寸和0.016英寸的钛记忆丝、Therma-Ti弓丝(美国正畸公司,希博伊根,威斯康星州)组合。弓丝用0.010英寸的不锈钢结扎丝和弹性环结扎到传统托槽上。模拟上颌中切牙牙龈向移位2mm(x轴)和唇向移位2mm(z轴)的错牙合。
使用0.014英寸弓丝时记录的力在x轴方向上为1.7±0.1至5.0±0.3N,在z轴方向上为1.2±0.1至5.5±0.3N。当使用0.016英寸弓丝时,力在x轴方向上为2.6±0.1至6.0±0.3N,在z轴方向上为2.0±0.2至6.0±0.4N。总体而言,x轴方向的增加范围为16.0%至120.0%,z轴方向的增加范围为10.4%至130.0%。
增加弓丝横截面会使所有托槽的力水平无一例外地增加。0.014英寸的弓丝产生相对较高的力水平,且力水平随着0.016英寸的弓丝而增加。