Suppr超能文献

[Comparison of 2 systems of blood culture: Signal and Bactec].

作者信息

Croizé J, Cadoux B, Leclerc P, François P, Brion J P, Le Noc P

机构信息

Laboratoire de Bactériologie, CHRU Grenoble.

出版信息

Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1989;47(6):311-6.

PMID:2675682
Abstract

Two Bactec bottles (aerobic and anaerobic) and one single bottle Signal were used for detecting bacteremia in 405 patients (47 children and 358 adults). The two blood culture Signal and Bactec aerobic were continuous shaking for up to 24 hours. 10.3 p. cent of patients had positive cultures (62.3 p. cent Gram +, aero-anaerobic bacteria). Nine bacteremia were detected by only one system (4 for signal, 4 for Bactec) 77.1 p. cent of 83 strains were positive on the two systems together, but 7.2 p. cent only in the Bactec and 15.6 p. cent only in the Signal. The delay of growth give an advantage to the Bactec (67 p. cent in 24 hours). The advantages and the disadvantages of the two systems were analysed.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验