• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人工老化的情况下,粘结式种植体固位冠的拉伸强度与可取出性之间是否存在相关性?

Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?

作者信息

Mehl Christian, Ali Shurouk, El Bahra Shadi, Harder Sönke, Vollrath Oliver, Kern Matthias

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):83-90. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4317.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.4317
PMID:26757337
Abstract

PURPOSE

The main goal of this in-vitro study was to evaluate whether tensile strength and retrievability of cemented implant-retained crowns correlate when using artificial aging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 128 crowns were fabricated from a cobalt-chromium alloy for 128 tapered titanium abutments (6 degrees taper, 4.3 mm diameter, 4 mm length, Camlog). The crowns were cemented with glass-ionomer (Ketac Cem, 3M) or resin cements (Multilink Implant, Telio CS Cem [Ivoclar Vivadent], Retrieve [Parkell]). Multilink Implant was used without priming. The experimental groups were subjected to either 37,500 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C, 1,200,000 chewing cycles, or a combination of both. Control groups were stored for 10 days in deionized water. The crowns were removed with a universal testing machine or a clinically used removal device (Coronaflex, KaVo). Data were statistically analyzed using nonparametrical tests.

RESULTS

Retention values were recorded between 31 N and 362 N. Telio CS Cem showed the lowest retention values, followed by Retrieve, Ketac Cem, and Multilink Implant (P≤.0001). The number of removal attempts with the Coronaflex were not significantly different between the cements (P>.05). Thermal cycling and chewing simulation significantly influenced the retrieval of Retrieve Telio CS Cem, and Ketac Cem specimens (P≤.05). Only for Multilink Implant and Telio CS Cem correlations between removal with the universal testing machine and the Coronaflex could be revealed (P≤.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ketac Cem and Multilink Implant (without silane) can be used for a semipermanent cementation. Retrieve and Telio CS Cem are recommendable for a temporary cementation.

摘要

目的

本体外研究的主要目的是评估在进行人工老化时,粘结式种植体固位冠的拉伸强度与可拆除性之间是否存在相关性。

材料与方法

用钴铬合金为128个锥形钛基台(锥度6度,直径4.3毫米,长度4毫米,Camlog)制作了128个全冠。全冠用玻璃离子水门汀(Ketac Cem,3M公司)或树脂水门汀(Multilink Implant、Telio CS Cem [义获嘉伟瓦登特公司]、Retrieve [帕克尔公司])粘结。Multilink Implant未用底涂剂。实验组分别经历5℃至55℃之间37500次热循环、1200000次咀嚼循环或两者的组合。对照组在去离子水中储存10天。用万能试验机或临床使用的拆除装置(Coronaflex,卡瓦公司)拆除全冠。数据采用非参数检验进行统计学分析。

结果

固位值记录在31牛至362牛之间。Telio CS Cem显示出最低的固位值,其次是Retrieve、Ketac Cem和Multilink Implant(P≤0.0001)。使用Coronaflex进行拆除尝试的次数在不同水门汀之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。热循环和咀嚼模拟对Retrieve、Telio CS Cem和Ketac Cem样本的拆除有显著影响(P≤0.05)。仅对于Multilink Implant和Telio CS Cem,可揭示出用万能试验机拆除与用Coronaflex拆除之间的相关性(P≤0.0001)。

结论

Ketac Cem和Multilink Implant(无硅烷)可用于半永久性粘结。Retrieve和Telio CS Cem推荐用于临时性粘结。

相似文献

1
Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?使用人工老化的情况下,粘结式种植体固位冠的拉伸强度与可取出性之间是否存在相关性?
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):83-90. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4317.
2
In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns.体外超声应力、去除力预载和热循环对种植体固位冠可取出性的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Aug;23(8):930-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02236.x. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
3
Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.骨水泥膜厚度对种植体支持式冠修复体固位力的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2013 Dec;22(8):618-25. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12058. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
4
Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.黏固后种植体固位冠的可取出性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1304-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01587.x.
5
Retrievability of implant-supported zirconia restorations cemented on zirconia abutments.氧化锆基台粘接氧化锆修复体的可取出性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov;120(5):740-746. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.不同黏结空间设置下制作的种植体支持的牙冠的水泥选择。
J Prosthodont. 2013 Feb;22(2):112-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00912.x.
7
The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.压缩循环加载对种植体基台上粘结的铸造单冠固位力的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):80-2. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4355.
8
Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.基台高度和冷热循环对固位力的影响:全瓷冠粘结固位修复体的临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1106-15.
9
Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.用于种植体支持修复体的各种粘接剂的固位力:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):649-54. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00008.
10
Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant.水泥类型和陶瓷底漆对一体式氧化锆种植体上聚合物渗透陶瓷冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jan;119(1):138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of surface treatment strategies on bond strength of additively and subtractively manufactured hybrid materials for permanent crowns.表面处理策略对用于永久冠的增材制造和减材制造混合材料粘结强度的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 13;28(7):371. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05767-3.
2
Bonding Strength of Various Luting Agents between Zirconium Dioxide Crowns and Titanium Bonding Bases after Long-Term Artificial Chewing.长期人工咀嚼后二氧化锆全冠与钛粘结基底之间各种粘结剂的粘结强度
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 24;16(23):7314. doi: 10.3390/ma16237314.
3
Application of Semipermanent Cements and Conventional Cement with Modified Cementing Technique in Dental Implantology.
半永久性粘结剂和传统粘结剂结合改良粘结技术在牙种植学中的应用
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021 Dec;55(4):367-379. doi: 10.15644/asc55/4/4.
4
Retention of different temporary cements tested on zirconia crowns and titanium abutments in vitro.体外研究不同暂封材料对氧化锆全瓷冠和钛基台的固位力影响。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 20;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00349-4.
5
In Vitro Simulation of Dental Implant Bridges Removal: Influence of Luting Agent and Abutments Geometry on Retrievability.牙种植桥拆除的体外模拟:粘结剂和基台几何形状对可拆除性的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 21;13(12):2797. doi: 10.3390/ma13122797.