• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙种植桥拆除的体外模拟:粘结剂和基台几何形状对可拆除性的影响。

In Vitro Simulation of Dental Implant Bridges Removal: Influence of Luting Agent and Abutments Geometry on Retrievability.

作者信息

Lugas Andrea T, Terzini Mara, Zanetti Elisabetta M, Schierano Gianmario, Manzella Carlo, Baldi Domenico, Bignardi Cristina, Audenino Alberto L

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polytechnic University of Turin, 10129 Turin, Italy.

PolitoBIOMed Lab, Polytechnic University of Turin, 10129 Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 21;13(12):2797. doi: 10.3390/ma13122797.

DOI:10.3390/ma13122797
PMID:32575862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7345726/
Abstract

Implant fixed dental prostheses are widely used for the treatment of edentulism, often preferred over the screw-retained ones. However, one of the main features of an implant-supported prosthesis is retrievability, which could be necessary in the case of implant complications. In this study, the retrievability of implant-fixed dental prostheses was investigated considering two of the main factors dental practitioners have to deal with: the abutments geometry and the luting agent. Impulsive forces were applied to dental bridge models to simulate crowns' retrievability in clinical conditions. The number of impulses and the impulsive force delivered during each test were recorded and used as retrievability indexes. One-hundred-and-five tests were conducted on 21 combinations of bridges and luting agents, and a Kruskal-Wallis test was performed on the results. The abutment geometry significantly influenced the number of impulses needed for retrieval ( < 0.05), and a cement-dependent trend was observed as well. On the other hand, the forces measured during tests showed no clear correlation with bridge retrievability. The best retrievability was obtained with long, slightly tapered abutments and a temporary luting agent.

摘要

种植体固定义齿被广泛用于牙列缺失的治疗,通常比螺丝固位的义齿更受青睐。然而,种植体支持的义齿的一个主要特点是可取出性,这在种植体出现并发症的情况下可能是必要的。在本研究中,考虑到牙科医生必须应对的两个主要因素:基台几何形状和粘结剂,对种植体固定义齿的可取出性进行了研究。对牙桥模型施加冲击力,以模拟临床情况下牙冠的可取出性。记录每次测试中施加的冲击次数和冲击力,并将其用作可取出性指标。对21种牙桥和粘结剂组合进行了105次测试,并对结果进行了Kruskal-Wallis检验。基台几何形状对取出所需的冲击次数有显著影响(<0.05),并且还观察到了与粘结剂相关的趋势。另一方面,测试期间测量的力与牙桥的可取出性没有明显的相关性。使用长的、略微锥形的基台和临时粘结剂可获得最佳的可取出性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/925c76538588/materials-13-02797-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/a586577a380b/materials-13-02797-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/e18554f7980f/materials-13-02797-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/3f7a7668ee0c/materials-13-02797-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/71e6df547181/materials-13-02797-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/95fc0095e4f9/materials-13-02797-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/1b6cce2b8f68/materials-13-02797-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/87a6cd8f79e3/materials-13-02797-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/925c76538588/materials-13-02797-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/a586577a380b/materials-13-02797-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/e18554f7980f/materials-13-02797-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/3f7a7668ee0c/materials-13-02797-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/71e6df547181/materials-13-02797-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/95fc0095e4f9/materials-13-02797-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/1b6cce2b8f68/materials-13-02797-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/87a6cd8f79e3/materials-13-02797-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/7345726/925c76538588/materials-13-02797-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
In Vitro Simulation of Dental Implant Bridges Removal: Influence of Luting Agent and Abutments Geometry on Retrievability.牙种植桥拆除的体外模拟:粘结剂和基台几何形状对可拆除性的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 21;13(12):2797. doi: 10.3390/ma13122797.
2
In Vitro Impact Testing to Simulate Implant-Supported Prosthesis Retrievability in Clinical Practice: Influence of Cement and Abutment Geometry.体外冲击测试以模拟临床实践中种植体支持修复体的可取出性:粘结剂和基台几何形状的影响
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 9;13(7):1749. doi: 10.3390/ma13071749.
3
Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.CAD/CAM 种植体基台和黏结固位氧化锆全瓷冠边缘位置和黏结材料对未检出多余粘结剂量的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0809-2.
4
Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.基台高度和冷热循环对固位力的影响:全瓷冠粘结固位修复体的临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1106-15.
5
Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.基台修整和水门汀类型对粘结固位种植体支持冠固位力的影响
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 May;11(3):256-62. Epub 2014 May 31.
6
Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study.不同粘结剂粘结的种植体支持金属全冠的留存率:一项体外比较研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):ZC61-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15912.7635. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.临时粘接剂与基台表面粗糙度对临时种植体支持冠固位力的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jun;95(6):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.020.
8
In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns.体外超声应力、去除力预载和热循环对种植体固位冠可取出性的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Aug;23(8):930-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02236.x. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
9
Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?使用人工老化的情况下,粘结式种植体固位冠的拉伸强度与可取出性之间是否存在相关性?
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):83-90. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4317.
10
Retrievability of implant-supported zirconia restorations cemented on zirconia abutments.氧化锆基台粘接氧化锆修复体的可取出性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov;120(5):740-746. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the dislodgement force of splinted restorations with engaging conical abutments over multiple nonparallel implants (in-vitro study).评估带有锥形邻接体的夹板修复体在多个非平行种植体上的脱位力(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 17;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02958-4.
2
The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An study.不同清洁临时水门汀方法(含丁香酚和不含丁香酚)对最终粘结后种植体支持的氧化锆基台最终粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:22. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369624. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
In Vitro Impact Testing to Simulate Implant-Supported Prosthesis Retrievability in Clinical Practice: Influence of Cement and Abutment Geometry.体外冲击测试以模拟临床实践中种植体支持修复体的可取出性:粘结剂和基台几何形状的影响
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 9;13(7):1749. doi: 10.3390/ma13071749.
2
Influence of abutment height and convergence angle on the retrievability of cement-retained implant prostheses with a lingual slot.基台高度和聚合角度对带舌侧沟的水泥固定种植义齿可取出性的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Oct;10(5):381-387. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.381. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Reliability, Learnability and Efficiency of Two Tools for Cement Crowns Retrieval in Dentistry.
Novel Load Systems for Testing of Biomaterials and Medical Devices.
用于生物材料和医疗器械测试的新型加载系统。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 4;16(2):465. doi: 10.3390/ma16020465.
4
Application of Semipermanent Cements and Conventional Cement with Modified Cementing Technique in Dental Implantology.半永久性粘结剂和传统粘结剂结合改良粘结技术在牙种植学中的应用
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021 Dec;55(4):367-379. doi: 10.15644/asc55/4/4.
牙科中两种用于取出水泥冠的工具的可靠性、可学习性和效率
Open Biomed Eng J. 2018 Jun 29;12:27-35. doi: 10.2174/1874120701812010027. eCollection 2018.
4
Clinical Assessment of Dental Implant Stability During Follow-Up: What Is Actually Measured, and Perspectives.临床评估种植体稳定性随访:实际测量内容及展望。
Biosensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 13;8(3):68. doi: 10.3390/bios8030068.
5
Retrievability of implant-supported zirconia restorations cemented on zirconia abutments.氧化锆基台粘接氧化锆修复体的可取出性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov;120(5):740-746. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.螺钉固位与粘结固位的种植体支持固定义齿修复。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):141-151. doi: 10.1111/prd.12168.
7
Method to improve passive fit of frameworks on implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study.改善种植体支持修复体支架被动适合性的方法:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jul;116(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
8
Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?使用人工老化的情况下,粘结式种植体固位冠的拉伸强度与可取出性之间是否存在相关性?
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):83-90. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4317.
9
Characterization of Cement Particles Found in Peri-implantitis-Affected Human Biopsy Specimens.种植体周围炎患者活检标本中发现的骨水泥颗粒的特征
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1168-73. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4074.
10
In vitro standardization of two different removal devices in cemented implant prosthesis.骨水泥型种植体修复中两种不同取出装置的体外标准化
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Aug;27(8):1026-30. doi: 10.1111/clr.12671. Epub 2015 Jul 27.