Mao Zhen, Schmidt Franziska, Beuer Florian, Yassine Jamila, Hey Jeremias, Prause Elisabeth
Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Martin-Luther-University, Magdeburger Str. 16, 06112, Halle, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 13;28(7):371. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05767-3.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the bond strength of different computer-aided design / computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) hybrid ceramic materials following different pretreatments.
A total of 306 CAD/CAM hybrid material specimens were manufactured, n = 102 for each material (VarseoSmile Crown [VSCP] by 3D-printing; Vita Enamic [VE] and Grandio Blocs [GB] by milling). Each material was randomly divided into six groups regarding different pretreatment strategies: control, silane, sandblasting (50 μm aluminum oxide particles), sandblasting + silane, etching (9% hydrofluorics acid), etching + silane. Subsequently, surface roughness (Ra) values, surface free energy (SFE) were measured. Each specimen was bonded with a dual-cured adhesive composite. Half of the specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5-55 °C). The shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed. Data were analyzed by using a two-way analysis of variance, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney-U-test (α = 0.05).
Material type (p = 0.001), pretreatment strategy (p < 0.001), and the interaction (p < 0.001) all had significant effects on Ra value. However, only etching on VSCP and VE surface increased SFE value significantly. Regarding SBS value, no significant difference was found among the three materials (p = 0.937), while the pretreatment strategy significantly influenced SBS (p < 0.05). Etching on VSCP specimens showed the lowest mean value among all groups, while sandblasting and silane result in higher SBS for all test materials.
The bond strength of CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic materials for milling and 3D-printing was comparable. Sandblasting and silane coupling were suitable for both millable and printable materials, while hydrofluoric etching should not be recommended for CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic materials.
Since comparable evidence between 3D-printable and millable CAD/CAM dental hybrid materials is scarce, the present study gives clear guidance for pretreatment planning on different materials.
本研究旨在评估不同预处理后不同计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)混合陶瓷材料的粘结强度。
共制作306个CAD/CAM混合材料试件,每种材料102个(通过3D打印制作的VarseoSmile Crown [VSCP];通过铣削制作的Vita Enamic [VE]和Grandio Blocs [GB])。每种材料根据不同的预处理策略随机分为六组:对照组、硅烷处理组、喷砂处理组(50μm氧化铝颗粒)、喷砂+硅烷处理组、蚀刻处理组(9%氢氟酸)、蚀刻+硅烷处理组。随后,测量表面粗糙度(Ra)值和表面自由能(SFE)。每个试件用双固化粘结性复合材料粘结。一半试件进行热循环(5000次循环,5-55°C)。进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试。数据采用双向方差分析、独立t检验和Mann-Whitney-U检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。
材料类型(p = 0.001)、预处理策略(p < 0.001)和交互作用(p < 0.001)对Ra值均有显著影响。然而,仅VSCP和VE表面的蚀刻显著提高了SFE值。关于SBS值,三种材料之间未发现显著差异(p = 0.937),而预处理策略对SBS有显著影响(p < 0.05)。VSCP试件上的蚀刻在所有组中显示出最低平均值,而喷砂和硅烷处理使所有测试材料的SBS更高。
铣削和3D打印的CAD/CAM混合陶瓷材料的粘结强度相当。喷砂和硅烷偶联适用于可铣削和可打印材料,而氢氟酸蚀刻不推荐用于CAD/CAM混合陶瓷材料。
由于3D可打印和可铣削的CAD/CAM牙科混合材料之间的可比证据稀缺,本研究为不同材料的预处理方案提供了明确指导。