Delgado Carolina, Muñoz-Neira Carlos, Soto Ambar, Martínez Melissa, Henríquez Fernando, Flores Patricia, Slachevsky Andrea
Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380456, Chile Neurology Department, Clínica Santa Maria, Santiago 8420485, Chile
Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Unit. Neurology Department Hospital del Salvador Santiago 7500922 Chile.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Mar;31(2):165-75. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv107. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
The aim of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of the "Word" and "Picture" versions of the Spanish FCSRT across the same sample of mild Alzheimer disease (AD) patients and controls. Mild AD patients (N = 50, 27 CDR = 0.5; 23 CDR = 1) and controls (N = 42, CDR = 0) were assessed with an extensive clinical and neuropsychological evaluation. Psychometric characteristics for both versions of the FCSRT were compared. Free recall (FR) and total recall (TR) across both versions of the FCSRT showed areas under the curve >0.9 and did not significantly differ between them. The scores of both versions were well correlated, although the scores for the Picture version were greater than those for the Word version, particularly for the TR scores of the mild AD group. Both versions of the FCSRT showed an appropriate accuracy to distinguish mild AD patients and controls. Visual cues were easier to recall than verbal cues, especially in the memory impaired patients.
本研究旨在比较西班牙版FCSRT的“文字”版和“图片”版在轻度阿尔茨海默病（AD）患者和对照组相同样本中的心理测量特性。对轻度AD患者（N = 50，27例CDR = 0.5；23例CDR = 1）和对照组（N = 42，CDR = 0）进行了广泛的临床和神经心理学评估。比较了FCSRT两个版本的心理测量特征。FCSRT两个版本的自由回忆（FR）和总回忆（TR）曲线下面积均>0.9，且两者之间无显著差异。两个版本的得分相关性良好，尽管图片版的得分高于文字版，尤其是轻度AD组的TR得分。FCSRT的两个版本在区分轻度AD患者和对照组方面都具有适当的准确性。视觉线索比言语线索更容易回忆，尤其是在记忆受损的患者中。
