Menezes Gisela L G, Stehouwer Bertine L, Klomp Dennis W J, van der Velden Tijl A, van den Bosch Maurice A A J, Knuttel Floortje M, Boer Vincent O, van der Kemp Wybe J M, Luijten Peter R, Veldhuis Wouter B
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Springerplus. 2016 Jan 5;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1654-7. eCollection 2016.
The aim of this study is to compare the current state of lesion identification, the BI-RADS classification and the contrast-enhancement behavior at 7T and 3T breast MRI in the same patient group. Twenty-seven patients with thirty suspicious lesions were selected for this prospective study and underwent both 7T and 3T MRI. All examinations were rated by two radiologists (R1 and R2) independently on image quality, lesion identification and BI-RADS classification. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV, observer agreement, lesion sizes, and contrast-enhancement-to-noise ratios (CENRs) of mass lesions. Fifteen of seventeen histopathological proven malignant lesions were detected at both field strengths. Image quality of the dynamic series was good at 7T, and excellent at 3T (P = 0.001 for R1 and P = 0.88 for R2). R1 found higher rates of specificity, NPV and PPV at 7T when compared to 3T, while R2 found the same results for sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV for both field strengths. The observers showed excellent agreement for BI-RADS categories at 7T (κ = 0.86) and 3T (κ = 0.93). CENRs were higher at 7T (P = 0.015). Lesion sizes were bigger at 7T according to R2 (P = 0.039). Our comparison study shows that 7T MRI allows BI-RADS conform analysis. Technical improvements, such as acquisition of T2w sequences and adjustment of B1+ field inhomogeneity, are still necessary to allow clinical use of 7T breast MRI.
本研究的目的是在同一患者群体中比较7T和3T乳腺MRI的病变识别现状、BI-RADS分类以及对比增强表现。选取27例患有30个可疑病变的患者进行这项前瞻性研究,并接受了7T和3T MRI检查。两位放射科医生(R1和R2)独立对所有检查的图像质量、病变识别和BI-RADS分类进行评分。我们评估了实性病变的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值、观察者一致性、病变大小以及对比增强噪声比(CENR)。在两个场强下均检测到了17个经组织病理学证实的恶性病变中的15个。动态序列的图像质量在7T时良好,在3T时极佳(R1的P = 0.001,R2的P = 0.88)。与3T相比,R1发现7T时的特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值更高,而R2发现两个场强下的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值结果相同。观察者对7T(κ = 0.86)和3T(κ = 0.93)时的BI-RADS类别显示出高度一致性。7T时的CENR更高(P = 0.015)。根据R2的结果,7T时的病变更大(P = 0.039)。我们的比较研究表明,7T MRI允许进行符合BI-RADS标准的分析。为了使7T乳腺MRI能够临床应用,仍然需要进行技术改进,如采集T2w序列和调整B1 + 场不均匀性。