• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者主动给医疗服务提供者发送电子邮件:与自付就诊费用的关联以及对就医行为和健康的影响。

Patient-initiated e-mails to providers: associations with out-of-pocket visit costs, and impact on care-seeking and health.

作者信息

Reed Mary, Graetz Ilana, Gordon Nancy, Fung Vicki

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612. E-mail:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2015 Dec 1;21(12):e632-9.

PMID:26760425
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand when patients use secure e-mail messaging with healthcare providers across several types of questions or concerns, associations between out-of-pocket costs for in-person visits and use of secure messaging, and to examine patient-reported impacts on care-seeking behavior and overall health.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of patients in an integrated healthcare delivery system, with access to a patient portal to send secure e-mail messages to providers at no out-of-pocket cost.

METHODS

The study included patients with a chronic condition (N = 1041). We described patient-reported preferences for contacting providers and patient-reported impact of e-mail use on phone calls, in-person visits, and overall health. We used multivariate analyses to examine patient characteristics associated with using e-mail as a first contact method, and effects on care-seeking and health.

RESULTS

Overall, 56% of patients sent their provider an e-mail within 1 year, and 46% reported e-mail as their first method of contact for 1 or more types of medical concerns. After adjustment, higher out-of-pocket costs for in-person visits were significantly associated with choosing e-mail as a first method of contact (P < .05). Among patients who had e-mailed their provider, 42% reported that it reduced their phone contacts, 36% reduced in-person office visits and 32% reported e-mailing improved their overall health.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reported using e-mail broadly to initiate conversations with their providers, and patients with higher out-of-pocket costs for in-person visits were more likely to choose e-mail as a first contact method. Use of secure e-mails reduced patients' use of other types of healthcare and resulted in improved overall health.

摘要

目的

了解患者在遇到多种类型的问题或担忧时,何时会使用安全电子邮件与医疗服务提供者沟通,当面就诊的自付费用与安全消息使用之间的关联,并研究患者报告的对寻求医疗行为和整体健康的影响。

研究设计

对一个综合医疗服务提供系统中的患者进行横断面调查,这些患者可通过患者门户网站以零自付费用向医疗服务提供者发送安全电子邮件。

方法

该研究纳入了患有慢性病的患者(N = 1041)。我们描述了患者报告的与医疗服务提供者联系的偏好,以及患者报告的电子邮件使用对电话沟通、当面就诊和整体健康的影响。我们使用多变量分析来研究与将电子邮件作为首次联系方法相关的患者特征,以及对寻求医疗和健康的影响。

结果

总体而言,56%的患者在1年内给他们的医疗服务提供者发送了电子邮件,46%的患者报告电子邮件是他们针对1种或多种医疗问题的首选联系方法。经过调整后,当面就诊的较高自付费用与选择电子邮件作为首选联系方法显著相关(P <.05)。在给医疗服务提供者发送过电子邮件的患者中,42%的患者报告这减少了他们的电话联系,36%的患者减少了当面就诊次数,32%的患者报告电子邮件改善了他们的整体健康。

结论

患者报告广泛使用电子邮件与医疗服务提供者展开对话,当面就诊自付费用较高的患者更有可能选择电子邮件作为首选联系方法。使用安全电子邮件减少了患者对其他类型医疗服务的使用,并改善了整体健康。

相似文献

1
Patient-initiated e-mails to providers: associations with out-of-pocket visit costs, and impact on care-seeking and health.患者主动给医疗服务提供者发送电子邮件:与自付就诊费用的关联以及对就医行为和健康的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Dec 1;21(12):e632-9.
2
Impact of Alternative Encounter Types on HIV Viral Suppression Rates in an Integrated Health System.综合卫生系统中不同类型就诊对 HIV 病毒抑制率的影响。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Nov;32(11):425-431. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0079.
3
Impact of patient portal secure messages and electronic visits on adult primary care office visits.患者门户网站安全消息和电子就诊对成人初级保健门诊就诊的影响。
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Mar;20(3):192-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0097. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
4
Patient-physician e-mail: an opportunity to transform pediatric health care delivery.患者与医生之间的电子邮件:转变儿科医疗服务的契机。
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):701-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1094.
5
A content analysis of e-mail communication between primary care providers and parents.对初级保健提供者与家长之间电子邮件通信的内容分析。
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1283-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1297.
6
Electronic patient-provider communication: will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care?电子患者与医疗服务提供者沟通:它会取代初级保健中的门诊就诊和电话咨询吗?
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Sep;74(9):705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.002.
7
Association between secure patient-clinician email and clinical services utilisation in a US integrated health system: a retrospective cohort study.美国综合医疗系统中安全的患者-临床医生电子邮件与临床服务利用之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 9;5(11):e009557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009557.
8
Patient Characteristics Associated With Choosing a Telemedicine Visit vs Office Visit With the Same Primary Care Clinicians.与选择与同一位初级保健临床医生进行远程医疗访问相比,与患者特征相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205873. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5873.
9
Changes in office visit use associated with electronic messaging and telephone encounters among patients with diabetes in the PCMH.在以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)中,糖尿病患者使用电子信息和电话问诊后门诊就诊情况的变化。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jul;12(4):338-43. doi: 10.1370/afm.1642.
10
Growth of Secure Messaging Through a Patient Portal as a Form of Outpatient Interaction across Clinical Specialties.通过患者门户实现的安全消息传递的增长作为跨临床专业门诊互动的一种形式。
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Apr 29;6(2):288-304. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-12-RA-0117. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Parsley Health: Feasibility and acceptability of a large-scale holistic telehealth program for chronic disease care.欧芹健康:一项针对慢性病护理的大规模整体远程医疗项目的可行性与可接受性。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Mar 15;5:1008574. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1008574. eCollection 2023.
2
Patient-Centered Digital Health Records and Their Effects on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.以患者为中心的数字化健康档案及其对健康结果的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 22;24(12):e43086. doi: 10.2196/43086.
3
Classification of patient- and clinician-generated secure messages using a theory-based taxonomy.
使用基于理论的分类法对患者和临床医生生成的安全信息进行分类。
Health Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;4(2):e295. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.295. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Quantifying Patient Portal Use: Systematic Review of Utilization Metrics.量化患者门户使用情况:利用指标的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):e23493. doi: 10.2196/23493.
5
Capturing the Impact of Patient Portals Based on the Quadruple Aim and Benefits Evaluation Frameworks: Scoping Review.基于四重目标和效益评估框架捕捉患者门户的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 8;22(12):e24568. doi: 10.2196/24568.
6
Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Patient-Professional Communication Over Patient Portals: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.医疗保健专业人员在患者门户中与患者进行专业沟通的体验:定性研究的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 8;22(12):e21623. doi: 10.2196/21623.
7
Physicians' electronic inbox work patterns and factors associated with high inbox work duration.医生电子收件箱工作模式及与收件箱工作时间长相关的因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):923-930. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa229.
8
A Retrospective Analysis of Provider-to-Patient Secure Messages: How Much Are They Increasing, Who Is Doing the Work, and Is the Work Happening After Hours?对医疗服务提供者与患者之间安全信息的回顾性分析:其增长幅度有多大、谁在进行这项工作以及这项工作是否在工作时间之外开展?
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 8;8(7):e16521. doi: 10.2196/16521.
9
Persistent digital divide in health-related internet use among cancer survivors: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003-2018.癌症幸存者在与健康相关的互联网使用方面持续存在数字鸿沟:来自 2003-2018 年健康信息国家趋势调查的结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):87-98. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00913-8. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
10
Disparities in Secure Messaging Uptake Between Patients and Physicians: Longitudinal Analysis of Two National Cross-Sectional Surveys.患者与医生之间安全消息传递使用情况的差异:两项全国性横断面调查的纵向分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 1;22(5):e12611. doi: 10.2196/12611.