• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较AMS-Vitek、MicroScan和Autobac II系列用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的性能。

Comparison of AMS-Vitek, MicroScan, and Autobac Series II for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.

作者信息

Truant A L, Starr E, Nevel C A, Tsolakis M, Fiss E F

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 May-Jun;12(3):211-5. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90017-5.

DOI:10.1016/0732-8893(89)90017-5
PMID:2676327
Abstract

Identification of Gram-negative bacilli by AMS-Vitek, MicroScan, and Autobac Series II was evaluated with 434 clinical isolates comprising glucose fermenters and glucose nonfermenters. The organisms were tested in each of the three systems (the AMS Vitek GNI card, the MicroScan Combo Plus Panel, and the Autobac 18 chamber cuvette). API 20E was used as the primary reference system. MicroScan and Vitek correctly identified 96.1% and 95.6% of the organisms, respectively. The Autobac Series II identified 82.3% of the organisms correctly. Results with MicroScan, Vitek, and Autobac were available in 24-48 hours, 4-18 hours, and 3-8 hours, respectively.

摘要

采用包含葡萄糖发酵菌和葡萄糖非发酵菌的434株临床分离株,对AMS-Vitek、MicroScan和Autobac II系列进行革兰氏阴性杆菌鉴定评估。这些菌株在三个系统(AMS Vitek GNI卡、MicroScan Combo Plus Panel和Autobac 18孔比色皿)中分别进行测试。API 20E用作主要参考系统。MicroScan和Vitek分别正确鉴定了96.1%和95.6%的菌株。Autobac II系列正确鉴定了82.3%的菌株。MicroScan、Vitek和Autobac的结果分别在24-48小时、4-18小时和3-8小时内可得。

相似文献

1
Comparison of AMS-Vitek, MicroScan, and Autobac Series II for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.比较AMS-Vitek、MicroScan和Autobac II系列用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的性能。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 May-Jun;12(3):211-5. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90017-5.
2
Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.autoSCAN-W/A快速细菌鉴定系统与Vitek自动微生物鉴定系统对革兰氏阴性杆菌鉴定的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jul;29(7):1422-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1422-1428.1991.
3
Evaluation of autoSCAN-W/A and the Vitek GNI+ AutoMicrobic system for identification of non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli.评估自动扫描-W/A和Vitek GNI+自动微生物鉴定系统对非葡萄糖发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Mar;38(3):1127-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.3.1127-1130.2000.
4
Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.对API 20E、Vitek GNI、MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID和Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF用于鉴定肠杆菌科成员及常见革兰氏阴性、非葡萄糖发酵杆菌的准确性进行平行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3165-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3165-3169.1993.
5
Comparison of MicroScan WalkAway system and Vitek system for identification of gram-negative bacteria.MicroScan WalkAway系统与Vitek系统用于革兰氏阴性菌鉴定的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Nov;33(11):3044-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.3044-3046.1995.
6
Evaluation of the Vitek 2 ID-GNB assay for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other nonenteric gram-negative bacilli and comparison with the Vitek GNI+ card.评估Vitek 2 ID-GNB检测法对肠杆菌科细菌及其他非肠道革兰氏阴性杆菌的鉴定能力,并与Vitek GNI+卡进行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 May;41(5):2096-101. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.2096-2101.2003.
7
Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.Quantum II细菌鉴定系统与自动微生物鉴定系统用于革兰氏阴性杆菌鉴定的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jan;23(1):1-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.1.1-5.1986.
8
Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的晶体肠杆菌/非发酵菌系统、API 20E系统和Vitek自动微生物鉴定系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):364-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.364-370.1995.
9
Comparison of Vitek GNI and GNI+ cards for identification of gram-negative bacteria.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性菌的Vitek GNI卡和GNI +卡的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2775-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.9.2775-2777.1998.
10
Evaluation of the new Vitek 2 GN card for the identification of gram-negative bacilli frequently encountered in clinical laboratories.新型Vitek 2 GN卡用于鉴定临床实验室常见革兰氏阴性杆菌的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Oct;24(10):671-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-0026-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Infective Endocarditis: Identification of Catalase-Negative, Gram-Positive Cocci from Blood Cultures by Partial 16S rRNA Gene Analysis and by Vitek 2 Examination.感染性心内膜炎:通过部分16S rRNA基因分析和Vitek 2检测从血培养物中鉴定过氧化氢酶阴性革兰氏阳性球菌
Open Microbiol J. 2010;4:116-22. doi: 10.2174/1874285801004010116. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
2
Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.对API 20E、Vitek GNI、MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID和Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF用于鉴定肠杆菌科成员及常见革兰氏阴性、非葡萄糖发酵杆菌的准确性进行平行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3165-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3165-3169.1993.
3
Comparison of Vitek and Cobas Micro systems with a semiautomated conventional microsystem for identification and susceptibility testing of gram negative bacilli.Vitek和Cobas微生物系统与半自动传统微生物系统用于革兰氏阴性杆菌鉴定和药敏试验的比较。
J Clin Pathol. 1994 Jan;47(1):71-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.1.71.
4
Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.微生物鉴定自动化系统
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992 Jul;5(3):302-27. doi: 10.1128/CMR.5.3.302.
5
Evaluation of a new commercial system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria.一种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵菌的新型商业系统的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;11(7):610-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01961667.