Schönenberger Silvia, Niesen Wolf-Dirk, Fuhrer Hannah, Bauza Colleen, Klose Christina, Kieser Meinhard, Suarez José I, Seder David B, Bösel Julian
Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Int J Stroke. 2016 Apr;11(3):368-79. doi: 10.1177/1747493015616638. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Tracheostomy is a common procedure in long-term ventilated critical care patients and frequently necessary in those with severe stroke. The optimal timing for tracheostomy is still unknown, and it is controversial whether early tracheostomy impacts upon functional outcome.
The Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy vs. Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical care Trial 2 (SETPOINT2) is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-blinded endpoint (PROBE-design) trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage who are so severely affected that two weeks of ventilation are presumed necessary based on a prediction score are eligible. It is intended to enroll 190 patients per group (n = 380). Patients are randomized to either percutaneous tracheostomy within the first five days after intubation or to ongoing orotracheal intubation with consecutive weaning and extubation and, if the latter failed, to percutaneous tracheostomy from day 10 after intubation. The primary endpoint is functional outcome defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS, 0-4 (favorable) vs. 5 + 6 (unfavorable)) after six months; secondary endpoints are mortality and cause of mortality during intensive care unit-stay and within six months from admission, intensive care unit-length of stay, duration of sedation, duration of ventilation and weaning, timing and reasons for withdrawal of life support measures, relevant intracranial pressure rises before and after tracheostomy.
The necessity and optimal timing of tracheostomy in ventilated stroke patients need to be identified. SETPOINT2 should clarify whether benefits in functional outcome can be achieved by early tracheostomy in these patients.
气管切开术是长期接受机械通气的重症监护患者的常见操作,对于重症卒中患者而言也常常是必要的。气管切开术的最佳时机仍不明确,早期气管切开术是否会影响功能预后也存在争议。
神经重症监护试验2中的卒中相关早期气管切开术与延长经口气管插管术比较研究(SETPOINT2)是一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放盲终点(PROBE设计)试验。入选标准为急性缺血性卒中、脑出血或蛛网膜下腔出血患者,根据预测评分判断病情严重到预计需要通气两周。计划每组招募190例患者(n = 380)。患者被随机分为两组,一组在插管后前五天内行经皮气管切开术,另一组持续经口气管插管并连续进行撤机和拔管,如果后者失败,则在插管后第10天行经皮气管切开术。主要终点是六个月后根据改良Rankin量表(mRS,0 - 4分(良好)对5 + 6分(不良))定义的功能预后;次要终点包括重症监护病房住院期间及入院后六个月内死亡率和死亡原因、重症监护病房住院时间、镇静时间、通气和撤机时间、撤除生命支持措施的时间和原因、气管切开术前和术后相关颅内压升高情况。
需要确定通气性卒中患者气管切开术的必要性和最佳时机。SETPOINT2研究应明确早期气管切开术能否使这些患者获得功能预后改善。