Heather N, Tebbutt J
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1989 Oct;24(2):83-93. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(89)90070-7.
Dispute about the relative frequencies of abstinent and non-abstinent outcomes following alcoholism treatment cannot be resolved in the absence of consensually-agreed definitions of such outcome categories. A review of influential outcome studies reveals wide differences in how controlled drinking and even abstinence have been defined and it is reasonable to suppose that this is partly responsible for striking variations in rates reported in the literature. Some requirements of a more satisfactory definitional scheme are described and a proposal made which, if accepted, might help to resolve issues relating to the frequency of non-abstinent outcomes.