• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管癌切除术中淋巴结清扫的发展模式及2年生存分析

Development Pattern on Lymph Node Resection in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and 2-year Survival Analysis.

作者信息

Zhao Yunpeng, Dong Xiaopeng, Cong Bo, Peng Chuanliang, Sun Qifeng, Hao Yingtao, Zhao Xiaogang

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(7):606-610. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570375. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1055/s-0035-1570375
PMID:26765245
Abstract

Thoracoscopic-laparoscopic procedures have been used more in the operations of esophagus cancer; in most times we call it minimally invasive esophagectomy, which is becoming mature. However, the efficacy of minimally invasive esophagectomy is still unclear, especially about the dissection of lymph nodes and survival.  A retrospective review was performed. The development process of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer was divided into three stages: the first stage 20, the second stage 37, the third stage 50.  Total 107 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy between July 2010 and May 2015. The number of lymph node resected during the three stages increased significantly, with a mean of 12.65, 15.91, and 20.16 nodes, respectively ( = 0.0075). The number of lymph nodes dissection greater than or equal to 12 or 18 increased significantly ( = 0.000). The patients from the first and the second stages had the similar 2-year survival rate ( = 0.8618). There is no significant difference in the 2-year disease-free survival rate ( = 0.606).  Surgeons accumulate experience on lymphadenectomy during minimally invasive esophagectomy as time goes by, and experience on 50 to 60 cases is essential and necessary to accomplish an apparent progress.

摘要

胸腔镜-腹腔镜手术在食管癌手术中应用得越来越多;大多数时候我们称之为微创食管切除术,这种手术正逐渐成熟。然而,微创食管切除术的疗效仍不明确,尤其是在淋巴结清扫和生存率方面。进行了一项回顾性研究。食管癌微创食管切除术的发展过程分为三个阶段:第一阶段20例,第二阶段37例,第三阶段50例。2010年7月至2015年5月期间共有107例患者接受了微创食管切除术。三个阶段切除的淋巴结数量显著增加,平均分别为12.65个、15.91个和20.16个淋巴结(P = 0.0075)。清扫淋巴结数量大于或等于12个或18个的情况显著增加(P = 0.000)。第一阶段和第二阶段的患者2年生存率相似(P = 0.8618)。2年无病生存率无显著差异(P = 0.606)。随着时间的推移,外科医生在微创食管切除术中积累了淋巴结清扫经验,完成明显进展需要50至60例的经验是必不可少的。

相似文献

1
Development Pattern on Lymph Node Resection in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and 2-year Survival Analysis.微创食管癌切除术中淋巴结清扫的发展模式及2年生存分析
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(7):606-610. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570375. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
2
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术的生存率相当:基于国家癌症数据库的分析
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(2):244-253. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
3
Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.开放性三野与微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Mar;12(3):366-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.258632. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
4
[Comparative study of perioperative complications and lymphadenectomy between minimally invasive esophagectomy and open procedure].[微创食管切除术与开放手术围手术期并发症及淋巴结清扫的比较研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):922-5.
5
[Feasibility and safety of radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[胸腔镜食管癌根治术中纵隔淋巴结清扫的可行性与安全性]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;34(11):855-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.11.013.
6
Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.微创McKeown食管癌切除术的最新经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 7;21(45):12873-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12873.
7
Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.食管癌切除术后的生存情况:不同手术方式的倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct;104(4):1138-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.065. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
8
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients.微创食管切除术:俯卧位胸腔镜下食管游离及纵隔淋巴结清扫——130例患者的经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jul;203(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.03.016.
9
Survival outcomes of 220 consecutive patients with three-staged thoracoscopic esophagectomy.220例连续接受三阶段胸腔镜食管切除术患者的生存结果。
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov;29(8):1090-1099. doi: 10.1111/dote.12426. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
10
[Extent of lymphnode dissection with minimally invasive esophageal resection].[微创食管切除术中淋巴结清扫范围]
Zentralbl Chir. 2006 Dec;131(6):466-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-955449.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning curve for minimally invasive oesophagectomy of oesophageal cancer and survival analysis.微创食管癌切除术的学习曲线和生存分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Nov 10;16(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01712-7.