Bokhorst Leonard P, Lepistö Inari, Kakehi Yoshiyuki, Bangma Chris H, Pickles Tom, Valdagni Riccardo, Alberts Arnout R, Semjonow Axel, Strölin Petra, Montesino Manuel F, Berge Viktor, Roobol Monique J, Rannikko Antti
Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
BJU Int. 2016 Sep;118(3):366-71. doi: 10.1111/bju.13410. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
To study the risk of serial prostate biopsies on complications in men on active surveillance (AS) and determine the effect of complications on receiving further biopsies.
In the global Prostate cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study, men are prospectively followed on AS and repeat prostate biopsies are scheduled at 1, 4, and 7 years after the diagnostic biopsy, or once yearly if prostate-specific antigen-doubling time is <10 years. Data on complications after biopsy, including infection, haematuria, haematospermia, and pain, were retrospectively collected for all biopsies taken during follow-up in men from several large participating centres. Generalised estimating equations were used to test predictors of infection after biopsy. Competing risk analysis was used to compare the rates of men receiving further biopsies between men with and without previous complications.
In all, 2 184 biopsies were taken in 1 164 men. Infection was reported after 55 biopsies (2.5%), and one in five men reported any form of complication. At multivariable analysis, the number of previous biopsies was not a significant predictor of infection (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.43). The only significant predictor for infection was the type of prophylaxis used. Of all men with a complication at the diagnostic or first repeat biopsy, 21% did not have a repeat biopsy at the time a repeat biopsy was scheduled according to protocol, vs 12% for men without a previous biopsy complication.
In our present cohort of men on AS, we found no evidence that repeat prostate biopsy in itself posed a risk of infection. However, complications after biopsy were not uncommon and after a complication men were less likely to have further biopsies. We should aim to safely reduce the amount of repeat biopsies in men on AS.
研究在主动监测(AS)的男性中进行系列前列腺活检的并发症风险,并确定并发症对接受进一步活检的影响。
在全球前列腺癌国际研究:主动监测(PRIAS)研究中,对男性进行前瞻性主动监测,并在诊断性活检后1年、4年和7年安排重复前列腺活检,如果前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间小于10年,则每年进行一次。回顾性收集了来自几个大型参与中心的男性在随访期间进行的所有活检的活检后并发症数据,包括感染、血尿、血精和疼痛。使用广义估计方程来测试活检后感染的预测因素。采用竞争风险分析比较有和无既往并发症的男性接受进一步活检的比率。
总共对1164名男性进行了2184次活检。55次活检(2.5%)后报告有感染,五分之一的男性报告有任何形式的并发症。在多变量分析中,既往活检次数不是感染的显著预测因素(比值比1.04,95%置信区间0.76-1.43)。唯一显著的感染预测因素是所使用的预防类型。在诊断性或首次重复活检时有并发症的所有男性中,21%在根据方案安排重复活检时未进行重复活检,而无既往活检并发症的男性这一比例为12%。
在我们目前的主动监测男性队列中,我们没有发现证据表明重复前列腺活检本身会带来感染风险。然而,活检后并发症并不少见,且出现并发症后男性进行进一步活检的可能性较小。我们应旨在安全地减少主动监测男性的重复活检次数。