• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往活检结果为阴性的患者多参数磁共振成像的可靠性:与未进行活检的患者在检测临床显著前列腺癌方面的比较。

Reliability of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Previous Negative Biopsy: Comparison with Biopsy-Naïve Patients in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Barone Biagio, Napolitano Luigi, Calace Francesco Paolo, Del Biondo Dario, Napodano Giorgio, Grillo Marco, Reccia Pasquale, De Luca Luigi, Prezioso Domenico, Muto Matteo, Crocetto Felice, Ferro Matteo

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.

Unit of Urology, Hospital "Ospedale del Mare", ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 1;13(11):1939. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111939.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13111939
PMID:37296791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10253019/
Abstract

: Multiparametric magnetic resonance is an established imaging utilized in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as Gleason Score ≥ 4 + 3 or a maximum cancer core length 6 mm or longer, in patients with a previous negative biopsy. : The study was conducted as a retrospective observational study at the University of Naples "Federico II", Italy. Overall, 389 patients who underwent systematic and target prostate biopsy between January 2019 and July 2020 were involved and were divided into two groups: Group A, which included biopsy-naïve patients; Group B, which included re-biopsy patients. All mpMRI images were obtained using three Tesla instruments and were interpreted according to PIRADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) version 2.0. : 327 patients were biopsy-naïve, while 62 belonged to the re-biopsy group. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, total PSA (prostate-specific antigen), and number of cores obtained at the biopsy. 2.2%, 8.8%, 36.1%, and 83.4% of, respectively, PIRADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 biopsy-naïve patients reported a clinically significant prostate cancer compared to 0%, 14.3%, 39%, and 66.6% of re-biopsy patients ( < 0.0001- = 0.040). No difference was reported in terms of post-biopsy complications. : mpMRI confirms its role as a reliable diagnostic tool prior to performing prostate biopsy in patients who underwent a previous negative biopsy, reporting a comparable detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer.

摘要

多参数磁共振成像(Multiparametric magnetic resonance)是前列腺癌诊断过程中常用的一种成像技术。本研究旨在评估多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)在检测临床显著性前列腺癌方面的准确性和可靠性,临床显著性前列腺癌定义为Gleason评分≥4 + 3或最大癌灶长度≥6 mm,研究对象为既往活检结果为阴性的患者。本研究在意大利那不勒斯“费德里科二世”大学进行,属于回顾性观察研究。总体而言,纳入了2019年1月至2020年7月期间接受系统性和靶向性前列腺活检的389例患者,并将其分为两组:A组为初次活检患者;B组为再次活检患者。所有mpMRI图像均使用3特斯拉设备获取,并根据前列腺影像报告和数据系统(Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System,PIRADS)第2.0版进行解读。初次活检患者有327例,再次活检组有62例。两组在年龄、总前列腺特异性抗原(total PSA)以及活检获取的组织条数方面具有可比性。初次活检患者中,PIRADS 2、3、4和5类别的患者分别有2.2%、8.8%、36.1%和83.4%报告患有临床显著性前列腺癌,而再次活检患者中这一比例分别为0%、14.3%、39%和66.6%(P < 0.0001至P = 0.040)。活检后并发症方面未报告有差异。mpMRI证实了其在既往活检结果为阴性的患者进行前列腺活检前作为可靠诊断工具的作用,在检测临床显著性前列腺癌方面具有相似的检出率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10253019/5a6eaaefebed/diagnostics-13-01939-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10253019/fda15d1689bb/diagnostics-13-01939-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10253019/5a6eaaefebed/diagnostics-13-01939-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10253019/fda15d1689bb/diagnostics-13-01939-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10253019/5a6eaaefebed/diagnostics-13-01939-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Previous Negative Biopsy: Comparison with Biopsy-Naïve Patients in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.既往活检结果为阴性的患者多参数磁共振成像的可靠性:与未进行活检的患者在检测临床显著前列腺癌方面的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 1;13(11):1939. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111939.
2
Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统时代多参数磁共振成像在检测临床显著性前列腺癌中的阴性预测值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):402-414. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.048. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
4
Diagnostic pathway of the biopsy-naïve patient suspected for prostate cancer: Real-life scenario when multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging is not centralized.疑似前列腺癌的未经活检患者的诊断途径:多参数磁共振成像未集中时的实际情况。
Prog Urol. 2021 Oct;31(12):739-746. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.12.008. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature.多参数磁共振成像能否检测到有临床意义的前列腺癌?文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1045-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
6
Reliability of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 for excluding clinically significant prostate cancer using a 1.5 tesla scanner.使用 1.5T 扫描仪评估前列腺影像报告和数据系统 2.1 版排除临床显著前列腺癌的可靠性。
BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 28;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01241-6.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.单平面双参数和多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌诊断中的准确性:前列腺癌初诊患者的随机非劣效性试验。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):855-862. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
8
The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.“mpMRI 是否足够”或 IMRIE 研究:一项多中心研究,比较了活检前多参数磁共振成像与活检。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1027-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
9
Comparison of Prostate Biopsy with or without Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: An Observational Cohort Study.前列腺癌检测中前列腺活检与活检前多参数磁共振成像的比较:一项观察性队列研究。
J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):510-519. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.049.
10
The predictive value of the prostate health index vs. multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in prostate biopsy.前列腺健康指数与多参数磁共振成像对前列腺穿刺活检中前列腺癌诊断的预测价值。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):1889-1895. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03397-4. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Weakly supervised deep learning for multimodal MRI-TRUS registration: Toward assisting prostate biopsy guidance.用于多模态MRI-TRUS配准的弱监督深度学习:助力前列腺活检引导
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 8;11:20552076251375870. doi: 10.1177/20552076251375870. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy and Clinical Utility of Multiparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌诊断中的诊断效能及临床应用分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2025 Aug 27;17:1803-1812. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S543435. eCollection 2025.
3
Interpretable machine learning driven biomarker identification and validation for prostate cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings as predictors of general and clinically significant prostate cancer risk: A retrospective single-center study.临床及前列腺多参数磁共振成像结果作为一般及临床显著前列腺癌风险的预测指标:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Curr Urol. 2023 Sep;17(3):147-152. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000173. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
2
Vitamin D, a Regulator of Androgen Levels, Is Not Correlated to PSA Serum Levels in a Cohort of the Middle Italy Region Participating to a Prostate Cancer Screening Campaign.维生素D作为雄激素水平的调节剂,在参与前列腺癌筛查活动的意大利中部地区队列中与血清前列腺特异抗原水平无关。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 24;12(5):1831. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051831.
3
可解释的机器学习驱动的前列腺癌生物标志物识别与验证
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1528-1541. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-242. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
4
Interpretable multiparametric MRI radiomics-based machine learning model for preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant prostate masses: a diagnostic, multicenter study.基于可解释多参数MRI影像组学的机器学习模型用于术前鉴别前列腺良恶性肿块:一项多中心诊断性研究
Front Oncol. 2025 May 5;15:1541618. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1541618. eCollection 2025.
5
Impact of Nerve-Sparing Techniques on Prostate-Specific Antigen Persistence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multivariable Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Predictors.保留神经技术对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在的影响:临床和病理预测因素的多变量分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 13;15(8):987. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15080987.
6
A retrospective study on predicting clinically significant prostate cancer via a bi-parametric ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics model.一项基于双参数超声的深度学习影像组学模型预测临床显著前列腺癌的回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 8;15:1538854. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1538854. eCollection 2025.
7
Does Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.大小重要吗?一项回顾性研究,分析经会阴前列腺穿刺活检中PI-RADS 4类病变的大小及其与前列腺癌阳性的相关性。
Res Rep Urol. 2025 Feb 25;17:49-57. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S499930. eCollection 2025.
8
Pathologic characteristics and management strategies for two categories of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen undergoing radical prostatectomy.两类前列腺特异性抗原水平较低的前列腺癌患者接受根治性前列腺切除术后的病理特征及管理策略
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):37-46. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-538. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
9
The Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Prostate Volume: A Retrospective Analysis of Pre and Postoperative Measurements in Prostate Cancer Patients.体重指数与前列腺体积的相关性:前列腺癌患者术前和术后测量值的回顾性分析
Prostate. 2025 Apr;85(5):433-442. doi: 10.1002/pros.24845. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
10
Survival Outcomes for Men over 80 Years Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Analysis.80岁以上男性接受经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的生存结果:一项前瞻性分析。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;16(23):3995. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233995.
Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediction, Diagnosis, and Prognosis of Cancer.
人工智能和机器学习在癌症预测、诊断及预后中的作用。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 2;14(11):e31008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31008. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review.前列腺癌中的放射组学:最新综述。
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Jul 4;14:17562872221109020. doi: 10.1177/17562872221109020. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Management-Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.前列腺癌管理中的液体活检——当前挑战与未来展望
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 4;14(13):3272. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133272.
6
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
Risk of prostate cancer for men with prior negative biopsies undergoing magnetic resonance imaging compared with biopsy-naive men: A prospective evaluation of the PLUM cohort.对于接受磁共振成像检查的先前活检阴性的男性与活检初筛的男性相比,前列腺癌风险:PLUM 队列的前瞻性评估。
Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;128(1):75-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33875. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
8
The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.影像学与临床方法评估前列腺体积的比较:单中心回顾性研究。
Urol Int. 2021;105(9-10):804-810. doi: 10.1159/000516681. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
9
BRCA Germline Mutations in Prostate Cancer: The Future Is Tailored.前列腺癌中的BRCA种系突变:未来是个性化的。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 19;11(5):908. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050908.
10
Predicting the risk of prostate cancer in asymptomatic men: a cohort study to develop and validate a novel algorithm.预测无症状男性患前列腺癌的风险:一项开发和验证新算法的队列研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Apr 29;71(706):e364-e371. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X714137. Print 2021 May.