Gilmore Kate, Mora Luis, Barragues Alfonso, Mikkelsen Ida Krogh
Deputy Executive Director (Programme), UNFPA.
Chief, Gender, Human Rights and Culture Branch, Technical Division, UNFPA.
Health Hum Rights. 2015 Dec 10;17(2):167-79.
This paper argues that the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United Nations Human Rights Council can be a critical avenue for promoting a human rights-based approach to sexual and reproductive health and well-being due to its reliance on the principles of participation and accountability. Drawing on evidence from the UPR process since its inception in 2008, the paper analyzes the impact of the UPR in advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights. The evidence collected speaks to the political opportunity represented by the UPR at the country level to enhance government accountability and national dialogue on sexual and reproductive health and rights among key stakeholders. However, the UPR should not be seen in isolation from other human rights mechanisms. Countries' implementation of UPR recommendations should be done conjointly with the guidance provided by other human rights mechanisms, including the expert views of United Nations treaty monitoring bodies and Special Procedures, and alongside strong national human rights protection systems.
本文认为,联合国人权理事会的普遍定期审议(UPR)可以成为促进基于人权的性健康和生殖健康及福祉方针的关键途径,因为它依赖参与和问责原则。本文借鉴自2008年普遍定期审议进程启动以来的证据,分析了普遍定期审议在推进性健康和生殖健康及权利方面的影响。所收集的证据表明,普遍定期审议在国家层面为加强政府问责以及关键利益攸关方之间关于性健康和生殖健康及权利的国家对话提供了政治机遇。然而,普遍定期审议不应被视为与其他人权机制相孤立。各国对普遍定期审议建议的落实应与其他人权机制提供的指导相结合,包括联合国条约监测机构和特别程序的专家意见,同时还要有强大的国家人权保护体系。