Pesola Gene R, Argos Maria, Chinchilli Vernon M, Chen Yu, Parvez Faruque, Islam Tariqul, Ahmed Alauddin, Hasan Rabiul, Rakibuz-Zaman Muhammad, Ahsan Habibul
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA Section of Pulmonary/Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Harlem Hospital affiliated with Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jul;70(7):689-95. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206199. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
The spectrum of mortality outcomes by cause in populations with/without dyspnoea has not been determined. The study aimed to evaluate whether dyspnoea, a symptom, predicts cause-specific mortality differences between groups. The hypothesis was that diseases that result in chronic dyspnoea, those originating from the heart and lungs, would preferentially result in heart and lung disease mortality in those with baseline dyspnoea (relative to no dyspnoea) when followed over time.
A population-based sample of 11 533 Bangladeshis was recruited and followed for 11-12 years and cause-specific mortality evaluated in those with and without baseline dyspnoea. Dyspnoea was ascertained by trained physicians. The cause of death was determined by verbal autopsy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the Fine-Gray competing risk hazards model and logistic regression models were used to determine group differences in cause-specific mortality.
Compared to those not reporting dyspnoea at baseline, the adjusted HRs were 6.4 (3.8 to 10.7), 9.3 (3.9 to 22.3), 1.8 (1.2 to 2.8), 2.2 (1.0 to 5.1) and 2.8 (1.3 to 6.2) for greater risk of dying from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, heart disease, tuberculosis and lung cancer, respectively. In contrast, there was a similar risk of dying from stroke, cancer (excluding lung), liver disease, accidents and other (miscellaneous causes) between the dyspnoeic and non-dyspnoeic groups. In addition, the HR was 2.1 (1.7 to 2.5) for greater all-cause mortality in those with baseline dyspnoea versus no dyspnoea.
Dyspnoea, ascertained by a single question with binary response, predicts heart and lung disease mortality. Individuals reporting dyspnoea were twofold to ninefold more likely to die of diseases that involve the heart and/or lungs relative to the non-dyspnoeic individuals. Therefore, in those with chronic dyspnoea, workup to look for the five common dyspnoeic diseases resulting in increased mortality (COPD, asthma, heart disease, tuberculosis and lung cancer), all treatable, should reduce mortality and improve the public health.
有/无呼吸困难人群按病因划分的死亡结局谱尚未确定。本研究旨在评估呼吸困难这一症状是否能预测不同组之间特定病因的死亡率差异。假设是,随着时间推移,导致慢性呼吸困难的疾病,即源自心脏和肺部的疾病,在有基线呼吸困难的人群中(相对于无呼吸困难者)会优先导致心脏和肺部疾病死亡。
招募了11533名孟加拉国人群为样本,随访11 - 12年,并评估有和无基线呼吸困难者的特定病因死亡率。呼吸困难由经过培训的医生确定。死因通过口头尸检确定。采用Kaplan - Meier生存曲线、Fine - Gray竞争风险危害模型和逻辑回归模型来确定特定病因死亡率的组间差异。
与基线时未报告呼吸困难的人群相比,因慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、哮喘、心脏病、结核病和肺癌死亡风险增加的校正风险比(HR)分别为6.4(3.8至10.7)、9.3(3.9至22.3)、1.8(1.2至2.8)、2. (1.0至5.1)和2.8(1.3至6.2)。相比之下,呼吸困难组和非呼吸困难组因中风、癌症(不包括肺癌)、肝病、事故及其他(杂项原因)死亡的风险相似。此外,有基线呼吸困难者与无呼吸困难者相比,全因死亡率增加的HR为2.1(1.7至2.5)。
通过单一二元应答问题确定的呼吸困难可预测心脏和肺部疾病死亡率。报告有呼吸困难的个体死于涉及心脏和/或肺部疾病的可能性是未出现呼吸困难个体的两至九倍。因此,对于慢性呼吸困难患者,检查寻找导致死亡率增加的五种常见呼吸困难疾病(COPD、哮喘、心脏病、结核病和肺癌),这些疾病均可治疗,应能降低死亡率并改善公众健康。