Fernandes Orlando, Portugal Liana C L, Alves Rita de Cássia S, Arruda-Sanchez Tiago, Rao Anil, Volchan Eliane, Pereira Mirtes, Oliveira Letícia, Mourao-Miranda Janaina
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Laboratory of Neurophysiology of Behaviour, Biomedical Institute, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Laboratory of Neurophysiology of Behaviour, Biomedical Institute, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 15;145(Pt B):337-345. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.050. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Pattern recognition analysis (PRA) applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been used to decode cognitive processes and identify possible biomarkers for mental illness. In the present study, we investigated whether the positive affect (PA) or negative affect (NA) personality traits could be decoded from patterns of brain activation in response to a human threat using a healthy sample.
fMRI data from 34 volunteers (15 women) were acquired during a simple motor task while the volunteers viewed a set of threat stimuli that were directed either toward them or away from them and matched neutral pictures. For each participant, contrast images from a General Linear Model (GLM) between the threat versus neutral stimuli defined the spatial patterns used as input to the regression model. We applied a multiple kernel learning (MKL) regression combining information from different brain regions hierarchically in a whole brain model to decode the NA and PA from patterns of brain activation in response to threat stimuli.
The MKL model was able to decode NA but not PA from the contrast images between threat stimuli directed away versus neutral with a significance above chance. The correlation and the mean squared error (MSE) between predicted and actual NA were 0.52 (p-value=0.01) and 24.43 (p-value=0.01), respectively. The MKL pattern regression model identified a network with 37 regions that contributed to the predictions. Some of the regions were related to perception (e.g., occipital and temporal regions) while others were related to emotional evaluation (e.g., caudate and prefrontal regions).
These results suggest that there was an interaction between the individuals' NA and the brain response to the threat stimuli directed away, which enabled the MKL model to decode NA from the brain patterns. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that PRA can be used to decode a personality trait from patterns of brain activation during emotional contexts.
应用于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的模式识别分析(PRA)已被用于解码认知过程并识别精神疾病的可能生物标志物。在本研究中,我们使用健康样本,调查了是否可以从对人类威胁的脑激活模式中解码出积极情绪(PA)或消极情绪(NA)人格特质。
在34名志愿者(15名女性)进行简单运动任务期间采集fMRI数据,同时志愿者观看一组指向他们或远离他们的威胁刺激以及匹配的中性图片。对于每个参与者,来自通用线性模型(GLM)的威胁刺激与中性刺激之间的对比图像定义了用作回归模型输入的空间模式。我们应用了一种多核学习(MKL)回归,在全脑模型中分层组合来自不同脑区的信息,以从对威胁刺激的脑激活模式中解码NA和PA。
MKL模型能够从指向远离的威胁刺激与中性刺激之间的对比图像中解码出NA,但不能解码出PA,其显著性高于随机水平。预测的NA与实际NA之间的相关性和均方误差(MSE)分别为0.52(p值 = 0.01)和24.43(p值 = 0.01)。MKL模式回归模型识别出一个由37个区域组成的网络,这些区域对预测有贡献。其中一些区域与感知有关(例如枕叶和颞叶区域),而其他区域与情绪评估有关(例如尾状核和前额叶区域)。
这些结果表明,个体的NA与对指向远离的威胁刺激的脑反应之间存在相互作用,这使得MKL模型能够从脑模式中解码出NA。据我们所知,这是PRA可用于在情绪情境下从脑激活模式中解码人格特质的首个证据。