Fitzcharles M-A, Baerwald C, Ablin J, Häuser W
Division of Rheumatology, McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Center, Quebec, Canada.
Schmerz. 2016 Feb;30(1):47-61. doi: 10.1007/s00482-015-0084-3.
In the absence of an ideal treatment for chronic pain associated with rheumatic diseases, there is interest in the potential effects of cannabinoid molecules, particularly in the context of global interest in the legalization of herbal cannabis for medicinal use.
A systematic search until April 2015 was conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, www.cannabis-med.org and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials with a study duration of at least 2 weeks and at least ten patients per treatment arm with herbal cannabis or pharmaceutical cannabinoid products in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), osteoarthritis (OA), chronic spinal pain, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pain. Outcomes were reduction of pain, sleep problems, fatigue and limitations of quality of life for efficacy, dropout rates due to adverse events for tolerability, and serious adverse events for safety. The methodology quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Two RCTs of 2 and 4 weeks duration respectively with nabilone, including 71 FMS patients, one 4-week trial with nabilone, including 30 spinal pain patients, and one 5-week study with tetrahydrocannbinol/cannabidiol, including 58 RA patients were included. One inclusion criterion was pain refractory to conventional treatment in three studies. No RCT with OA patients was found. The risk of bias was high for three studies. The findings of a superiority of cannabinoids over controls (placebo, amitriptyline) were not consistent. Cannabinoids were generally well tolerated despite some troublesome side effects and safe during the study duration.
Currently, there is insufficient evidence for recommendation for any cannabinoid preparations for symptom management in patients with chronic pain associated with rheumatic diseases.
由于缺乏针对风湿性疾病相关慢性疼痛的理想治疗方法,人们对大麻素分子的潜在作用产生了兴趣,尤其是在全球范围内对药用草药大麻合法化感兴趣的背景下。
截至2015年4月,在Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、PubMed、www.cannabis - med.org和clinicaltrials.gov中进行了系统检索,以查找随机对照试验,这些试验的研究持续时间至少为2周,每个治疗组至少有10名患者,使用草药大麻或药用大麻素产品治疗纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)、骨关节炎(OA)、慢性脊柱疼痛和类风湿关节炎(RA)疼痛。疗效指标包括疼痛减轻、睡眠问题改善、疲劳缓解以及生活质量受限情况;耐受性指标为因不良事件导致的脱落率;安全性指标为严重不良事件。随机对照试验(RCT)的方法学质量通过Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行评估。
纳入了两项分别为期2周和4周使用纳布啡的RCT,共71例FMS患者;一项为期4周使用纳布啡的试验,共30例脊柱疼痛患者;以及一项为期5周使用四氢大麻酚/大麻二酚的研究,共58例RA患者。三项研究的一个纳入标准是对传统治疗无效的疼痛。未找到有关OA患者的RCT。三项研究的偏倚风险较高。大麻素优于对照组(安慰剂、阿米替林)的研究结果并不一致。尽管有一些麻烦的副作用,但大麻素在研究期间总体耐受性良好且安全。
目前,没有足够的证据推荐使用任何大麻素制剂来管理风湿性疾病相关慢性疼痛患者的症状。