• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于行为后果测量策略的同伴受害量表。

A peer victimisation scale based on a behavioural consequences measurement strategy.

作者信息

Han Jiyang, Xia Jing, He Qiang, Shao Yun, Zhan Yuhua, Liu Guo, Wang Xumei

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2016 May;57(5):254-61. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015144. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

DOI:10.11622/smedj.2015144
PMID:26768170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4876415/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An accurate assessment of peer victimisation (i.e. bullying) is a necessary precondition for research and intervention. Most assessment instruments use the 'list of acts' measurement strategy, which does not account for the actual physical and psychological damage inflicted by bullying. To resolve this limitation, this study developed a peer victimisation scale (PVS) that includes harmful consequences for judgement and measurement of peer victimisation.

METHODS

The PVS is a 40-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess the four aspects of peer victimisation: physical, verbal, relational, and interference and control. A total of 1,469 Grade 3-8 students (49.9% male) were recruited to test the psychometric properties of the PVS. Another 420 Grade 3-8 students were examined by a modified PVS supplemented with a semi-structured interview for scale validation and establishment of the cut-off points for severe bullying. Incidence, age and gender distribution of peer victimisation were also analysed.

RESULTS

The PVS demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.73-0.83) and test-retest reliability two weeks later (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.71-0.80). The scores for each dimension were significantly and positively correlated with the scores from the questionnaire-interview sample (r = 0.73-0.78), and modestly correlated with the scores for symptoms of anxiety and depression (r = 0.36-0.54).

CONCLUSION

The results were consistent with the measurement constructs, demonstrating that the PVS is a reliable and effective instrument for assessing peer victimisation in children. It may enable more reliable longitudinal studies assessing the impact of peer victimisation to be conducted.

摘要

引言

准确评估同伴间受欺负(即霸凌)情况是开展研究和干预的必要前提。大多数评估工具采用“行为清单”测量策略,该策略未考虑霸凌行为实际造成的身心伤害。为解决这一局限性,本研究开发了一种同伴间受欺负量表(PVS),该量表包含用于判断和衡量同伴间受欺负情况的有害后果。

方法

PVS是一份包含40个条目的自陈式问卷,旨在评估同伴间受欺负的四个方面:身体方面、言语方面、关系方面以及干扰和控制方面。共招募了1469名三至八年级学生(男生占49.9%)来测试PVS的心理测量特性。另外420名三至八年级学生接受了经过修改的PVS测试,并辅以半结构化访谈以进行量表验证和确定严重霸凌的临界点。还分析了同伴间受欺负情况的发生率、年龄和性别分布。

结果

PVS显示出良好的内部一致性信度(克朗巴哈系数α为0.73 - 0.83)以及两周后的重测信度(相关系数[r]=0.71 - 0.80)。各维度得分与问卷调查 - 访谈样本得分显著正相关(r = 0.73 - 0.78),与焦虑和抑郁症状得分呈中等程度相关(r = 0.36 - 0.54)。

结论

结果与测量构想一致,表明PVS是评估儿童同伴间受欺负情况的可靠且有效工具。它可能使开展更可靠的纵向研究来评估同伴间受欺负的影响成为可能。

相似文献

1
A peer victimisation scale based on a behavioural consequences measurement strategy.一种基于行为后果测量策略的同伴受害量表。
Singapore Med J. 2016 May;57(5):254-61. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015144. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
2
[Cultural adaptation to Spanish and assessment of an Adolescent Peer Relationships Tool for detecting school bullying: Preliminary study of the psychometric properties].《青少年同伴关系工具检测校园欺凌的西班牙文文化适应性及评估:心理测量特性的初步研究》
An Pediatr (Barc). 2017 Jul;87(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
3
Psychometric properties of Urdu version of adolescent peer relation instrument in Pakistan.巴基斯坦青少年同伴关系量表乌尔都语版本的心理测量特性
J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Jun;70(6):1048-1051. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.24659.
4
Social support, peer victimisation, and somatic complaints: a mediational analysis.社会支持、同伴欺凌与躯体不适:一项中介效应分析
J Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Jun;45(6):358-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01501.x. Epub 2009 May 28.
5
Peer dislike and victimisation in pathways from ADHD symptoms to depression.同伴反感与受欺凌在 ADHD 症状发展为抑郁过程中的作用。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;24(8):887-95. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0633-9. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
6
Psychometric properties of the Peer Interactions in Primary School (PIPS) Questionnaire.小学同伴互动(PIPS)问卷的心理测量学特性。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007 Apr;28(2):125-32. doi: 10.1097/01.DBP.0000267562.11329.8f.
7
Development of a measure of the experience of being bullied in youth.青少年被欺凌经历量表的编制。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):156-65. doi: 10.1037/a0025178. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
8
Development of the Multidimensional Peer Victimization Scale-Revised (MPVS-R) and the Multidimensional Peer Bullying Scale (MPVS-RB).多维同伴受欺负量表修订版(MPVS-R)和多维同伴欺负量表(MPVS-RB)的编制。
J Genet Psychol. 2015 Jan-Apr;176(1-2):93-109. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1007915. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
Can student self-ratings be compared with peer ratings? A study of measurement invariance of multisource feedback.学生自评能与同伴评价相比较吗?多源反馈的测量不变性研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 May;21(2):401-13. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9638-5. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
10
Peer victimisation during adolescence and its impact on wellbeing in adulthood: a prospective cohort study.青少年时期的同伴欺凌及其对成年期幸福感的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 15;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10198-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Which Children are Frequently Victimized in U.S. Elementary Schools? Population-based Estimates.在美国小学中,哪些儿童常成为受害者?基于人群的估计。
School Ment Health. 2022 Dec;14(4):1011-1023. doi: 10.1007/s12310-022-09520-7. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Chinese Culture, Homosexuality Stigma, Social Support and Condom Use: A Path Analytic Model.中国文化、同性恋污名、社会支持与避孕套使用:一个路径分析模型
Stigma Res Action. 2011;1(1):27-35. doi: 10.5463/sra.v1i1.16.
2
Different forms of bullying and their association to smoking and drinking behavior in Italian adolescents.不同形式的欺凌行为及其与意大利青少年吸烟和饮酒行为的关联。
J Sch Health. 2011 Jul;81(7):393-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00607.x.
3
Getting precise and pragmatic about the assessment of bullying: the development of the California Bullying Victimization Scale.准确而务实的欺凌评估:加州欺凌受害量表的发展。
Aggress Behav. 2011 May-Jun;37(3):234-47. doi: 10.1002/ab.20389. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
4
Approach to bullying and victimization.欺凌与受欺负问题的处理方法。
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Apr;55(4):356-60.
5
Reliability and validity of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED) in Chinese children.儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查量表(SCARED)在中国儿童中的信度和效度
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 May;22(4):612-21. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 Jun 3.
6
Associations between bullying behaviour, psychosomatic complaints, emotional and behavioural problems.霸凌行为、身心问题、情绪及行为问题之间的关联
J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Sep;44(9):492-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01155.x. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
7
A comparison of the Gatehouse Bullying Scale and the peer relations questionnaire for students in secondary school.中学学生的盖特豪斯欺凌量表与同伴关系问卷比较
J Sch Health. 2007 Feb;77(2):75-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00170.x.
8
A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying.一项关于预防欺凌的校本干预措施的系统综述。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jan;161(1):78-88. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.78.
9
Teachers' and pupils' definitions of bullying.教师和学生对霸凌行为的定义。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Sep;76(Pt 3):553-76. doi: 10.1348/000709905X52229.
10
The Perception of Teasing Scale (POTS): a revision and extension of the Physical Appearance Related Teasing Scale (PARTS).戏弄感知量表(POTS):身体外貌相关戏弄量表(PARTS)的修订与扩展。
J Pers Assess. 1995 Aug;65(1):146-57. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6501_11.