Vandebosch An, Mogg Robin, Goeyvaerts Nele, Truyers Carla, Greenwood Brian, Watson-Jones Debby, Herrera-Taracena Guillermo, Parys Wim, Vangeneugden Tony
Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Clin Trials. 2016 Feb;13(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/1740774515621059. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
Starting in December 2013, West Africa was overwhelmed with the deadliest outbreak of Ebola virus known to date, resulting in more than 27,500 cases and 11,000 deaths. In response to the epidemic, development of a heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimen was accelerated and involved preparation of a phase 3 effectiveness study. While individually randomized controlled trials are widely acknowledged as the gold standard for demonstrating the efficacy of a candidate vaccine, there was considerable debate on the ethical appropriateness of these designs in the context of an epidemic. A suitable phase 3 trial must convincingly ensure unbiased evaluation with sufficient statistical power. In addition, efficient evaluation of a vaccine candidate is required so that an effective vaccine can be immediately disseminated. This manuscript aims to present the statistical and modeling considerations, design rationale and challenges encountered due to the emergent, epidemic setting that led to the selection of a cluster-randomized phase 3 study design under field conditions.
自2013年12月起,西非遭遇了有史以来最致命的埃博拉病毒疫情,导致超过27500例病例和11000人死亡。为应对该疫情,加速了异源初免-加强疫苗方案的研发,并开展了一项3期有效性研究。虽然个体随机对照试验被广泛认为是证明候选疫苗疗效的金标准,但在疫情背景下,这些设计的伦理适当性存在相当大的争议。一项合适的3期试验必须令人信服地确保具有足够统计效力的无偏评估。此外,需要对候选疫苗进行高效评估,以便能立即推广有效的疫苗。本手稿旨在阐述统计和建模考量、设计原理以及由于紧急疫情环境所遇到的挑战,正是这些因素导致在实地条件下选择了整群随机3期研究设计。