Tell Richard A, Kavet Robert
Richard Tell Associates, Inc., 350 Falcon Ridge Parkway, Suite 103, Mesquite, NV 89027, USA
Electric Power Research Institute, 3420 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Dec;172(4):541-546. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv533. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Measurements were conducted to investigate electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) from 120 Hz to 10 kHz and 1.2 to 100 kHz in 9 electric or hybrid vehicles and 4 gasoline vehicles, all while being driven. The range of fields in the electric vehicles enclosed the range observed in the gasoline vehicles. Mean magnetic fields ranged from nominally 0.6 to 3.5 µT for electric/hybrids depending on the measurement band compared with nominally 0.4 to 0.6 µT for gasoline vehicles. Mean values of electric fields ranged from nominally 2 to 3 V m for electric/hybrid vehicles depending on the band, compared with 0.9 to 3 V m for gasoline vehicles. In all cases, the fields were well within published exposure limits for the general population. The measurements were performed with Narda model EHP-50C/EHP-50D EMF analysers that revealed the presence of spurious signals in the EHP-50C unit, which were resolved with the EHP-50D model.
对9辆电动或混合动力汽车和4辆汽油车在行驶过程中120 Hz至10 kHz以及1.2至100 kHz频段的电场和磁场(EMF)进行了测量。电动汽车中的场强范围涵盖了汽油车中观察到的范围。根据测量频段,电动/混合动力汽车的平均磁场强度名义上为0.6至3.5 μT,而汽油车的平均磁场强度名义上为0.4至0.6 μT。根据频段不同,电动/混合动力汽车的电场平均值名义上为2至3 V/m,而汽油车为0.9至3 V/m。在所有情况下,这些场强均远低于针对普通人群公布的暴露限值。测量使用的是Narda型号EHP - 50C/EHP - 50D EMF分析仪,结果显示EHP - 50C单元存在杂散信号,而EHP - 50D型号解决了这一问题。