Valberg P A, Kavet R, Rafferty C N
Gradient Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Radiat Res. 1997 Jul;148(1):2-21.
Some epidemiological studies have suggested that exposure to ambient, low-level 50/60 Hz electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) increases risk of disease. Whether this association has a causal basis depends in part on whether the electrical, chemical and mechanical "signals" induced within living cells by ambient EMFs are detectable in the complex milieu of voltages, currents and forces present within the living organism. Magnetic responsiveness has been found in some animals and bacteria; aquatic animals (e.g. sharks and rays) can sense weak electric fields. We outline the physics of several mechanisms by which EMFs may interact: (1) Energy transfer by acceleration of ions and charged proteins modifies cell membranes and receptor proteins; however, EMF energies are far below those typical of biomolecules in the cell. (2) Electric fields induced inside the body exert force on electric charges and electric moments; however, these forces are considerably smaller than typical biological forces. (3) The magnetic moments of ferromagnetic particles and free radical molecules interact with magnetic fields, but magnetic-moment sensory cells have not been found in humans, and modification of radical recombination rates by EMFs in a biological system is highly problematic. (4) Resonant interactions involve EMFs driving vibrational or orbital transitions in ion-biomolecule complexes; these mechanisms conflict with accepted physics, and many experimental tests have not found the predicted effects. (5) Temporal averaging or spatial summation can improve the ratio of "signal" to "noise" in any system, but this "mechanism" requires biological structures and neural processes having the necessary capabilities of EMF detection and temporal averaging that have not been found in humans. In summary, biological effects in humans due to extremely low-frequency EMFs of the order of those found in residential environments [< or = 2 microT (< or = 20 mG)] are implausible based on current understanding of physics and biology. Biological effects in humans at higher fields [> 10 microT (> 100 mG)] might reach plausibility as a result of time-averaging in combination with a magnetic-moment transduction mechanism; but even here, neither specialized EMF transduction structures nor appropriate averaging networks have been demonstrated. The bypothesis that the epidemiological associations observed between 50/60 Hz EMFs and disease reflect a causal relationship is not supported by what is known about mechanisms.
一些流行病学研究表明,暴露于环境中低水平的50/60赫兹电场和磁场(EMF)会增加患病风险。这种关联是否有因果关系,部分取决于环境EMF在活细胞内诱导产生的电、化学和机械“信号”,在生物体中存在的复杂电压、电流和力的环境中是否可被检测到。在一些动物和细菌中发现了磁响应性;水生动物(如鲨鱼和鳐鱼)能感知弱电场。我们概述了EMF可能相互作用的几种机制的物理学原理:(1)离子和带电蛋白质加速导致的能量转移会改变细胞膜和受体蛋白;然而,EMF能量远低于细胞中生物分子的典型能量。(2)体内感应的电场对电荷和电矩施加力;然而,这些力远小于典型的生物力。(3)铁磁性颗粒和自由基分子的磁矩与磁场相互作用,但在人类中尚未发现磁矩感应细胞,而且在生物系统中EMF对自由基重组率的改变极具问题。(4)共振相互作用涉及EMF驱动离子 - 生物分子复合物中的振动或轨道跃迁;这些机制与公认的物理学相冲突,并且许多实验测试未发现预期效果。(5)时间平均或空间求和可以提高任何系统中“信号”与“噪声”的比率,但这种“机制”需要具有EMF检测和时间平均所需能力的生物结构和神经过程,而在人类中尚未发现。总之,基于目前对物理学和生物学的理解,居住环境中发现的那种极低频率EMF(≤2微特斯拉(≤20毫高斯))对人类产生生物学效应是不太可能的。在更高磁场(>10微特斯拉(>100毫高斯))下,由于时间平均与磁矩转导机制相结合,人类产生生物学效应可能变得合理;但即便如此,既未证明存在专门的EMF转导结构,也未证明存在合适的平均网络。关于50/60赫兹EMF与疾病之间观察到的流行病学关联反映因果关系的假设,从已知机制来看是不成立的。