Yankeelov Thomas E, Mankoff David A, Schwartz Lawrence H, Lieberman Frank S, Buatti John M, Mountz James M, Erickson Bradley J, Fennessy Fiona M M, Huang Wei, Kalpathy-Cramer Jayashree, Wahl Richard L, Linden Hannah M, Kinahan Paul E, Zhao Binsheng, Hylton Nola M, Gillies Robert J, Clarke Laurence, Nordstrom Robert, Rubin Daniel L
Institute of Imaging Science, Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Physics, and Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15;22(2):284-90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3336.
As anticancer therapies designed to target specific molecular pathways have been developed, it has become critical to develop methods to assess the response induced by such agents. Although traditional, anatomic CT, and MRI examinations are useful in many settings, increasing evidence suggests that these methods cannot answer the fundamental biologic and physiologic questions essential for assessment and, eventually, prediction of treatment response in the clinical trial setting, especially in the critical period soon after treatment is initiated. To optimally apply advances in quantitative imaging methods to trials of targeted cancer therapy, new infrastructure improvements are needed that incorporate these emerging techniques into the settings where they are most likely to have impact. In this review, we first elucidate the needs for therapeutic response assessment in the era of molecularly targeted therapy and describe how quantitative imaging can most effectively provide scientifically and clinically relevant data. We then describe the tools and methods required to apply quantitative imaging and provide concrete examples of work making these advances practically available for routine application in clinical trials. We conclude by proposing strategies to surmount barriers to wider incorporation of these quantitative imaging methods into clinical trials and, eventually, clinical practice. Our goal is to encourage and guide the oncology community to deploy standardized quantitative imaging techniques in clinical trials to further personalize care for cancer patients and to provide a more efficient path for the development of improved targeted therapies.
随着旨在靶向特定分子途径的抗癌疗法不断发展,开发评估此类药物诱导反应的方法变得至关重要。尽管传统的解剖学CT和MRI检查在许多情况下都很有用,但越来越多的证据表明,这些方法无法回答对于评估乃至预测临床试验环境中治疗反应至关重要的基本生物学和生理学问题,尤其是在治疗开始后的关键时期。为了在靶向癌症治疗试验中最佳地应用定量成像方法的进展,需要进行新的基础设施改进,将这些新兴技术纳入最有可能产生影响的环境中。在本综述中,我们首先阐明分子靶向治疗时代对治疗反应评估的需求,并描述定量成像如何最有效地提供科学和临床相关数据。然后,我们描述应用定量成像所需的工具和方法,并提供实际将这些进展应用于临床试验常规操作的具体工作示例。我们通过提出策略来克服将这些定量成像方法更广泛地纳入临床试验以及最终纳入临床实践的障碍来得出结论。我们的目标是鼓励和指导肿瘤学界在临床试验中采用标准化的定量成像技术,以进一步实现癌症患者的个性化护理,并为开发改进的靶向治疗提供更有效的途径。