Depp Colin A, Moore Raeanne C, Dev Sheena I, Mausbach Brent T, Eyler Lisa T, Granholm Eric L
UC San Diego Department of Psychiatry, La Jolla, CA, United States; VA San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
UC San Diego Department of Psychiatry, La Jolla, CA, United States; VA San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 15;193:145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.016. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
Impulsivity is frequently linked with bipolar disorder and is associated with mania and negative outcomes. The temporal dynamics of subjective impulsivity are unclear, in particular whether impulsivity precedes or follows changes in positive or negative affect.
A total of 41 outpatients with bipolar disorder (I or II) were provided with mobile devices for 11 weeks and completed twice-daily surveys about affective states and subjective impulsivity. We examined the association between aggregate subjective impulsivity with baseline global cognitive function, suicide risk ratings, and medication adherence, as well as concurrent and lagged associations with momentary positive and negative affect ratings.
A total of 2902 ratings were available across study subjects. Higher aggregate mean ratings of impulsivity were associated with worse baseline global cognitive function, prior suicide attempts, and self-reported problems with medication adherence, as well as more severe manic (but not depressive) symptoms. Time-lagged models indicated that greater negative affect, but not positive affect, predicted subsequent increases in subjective impulsivity, which, in turn, predicted diminished positive affect.
Other measures of impulsivity with which to validate subjective ratings were unavailable and the sample was restricted to generally clinically stable outpatients.
Subjective impulsivity as measured by daily monitoring was associated with worse cognitive function and self-rated medication adherence, and higher suicide risk ratings. Impulsivity may be a maladaptive strategy to regulate negative affect in bipolar disorder.
冲动性常与双相情感障碍相关,且与躁狂及不良后果有关。主观冲动性的时间动态尚不清楚,尤其是冲动性是先于还是后于积极或消极情绪的变化。
共41名双相情感障碍(I型或II型)门诊患者配备移动设备11周,并每天两次完成关于情感状态和主观冲动性的调查。我们研究了总体主观冲动性与基线整体认知功能、自杀风险评级及药物依从性之间的关联,以及与瞬间积极和消极情绪评级的同时及滞后关联。
研究对象共有2902次评级。冲动性总体平均评分较高与较差的基线整体认知功能、既往自杀未遂及自我报告的药物依从性问题有关,以及与更严重的躁狂(而非抑郁)症状有关。时间滞后模型表明,更大的消极情绪而非积极情绪预测了随后主观冲动性的增加,而主观冲动性反过来又预测了积极情绪的减弱。
无法获得用于验证主观评级的其他冲动性测量方法,且样本仅限于一般临床稳定的门诊患者。
通过每日监测测量的主观冲动性与较差的认知功能、自我报告的药物依从性及更高的自杀风险评级有关。冲动性可能是双相情感障碍中调节消极情绪的一种适应不良策略。