Ramírez-Martín Almudena, Sirignano Lea, Foo Jerome C, Streit Fabian, Frank Josef, Witt Stephanie H, Rietschel Marcella, Mayoral-Cleries Fermin, Moreno-Küstner Berta, Guzmán-Parra Jose
Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA-PlataformaBionand), Malaga, Spain.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0314963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314963. eCollection 2025.
Impulsivity is a key feature of bipolar disorder (BD) associated with various negative outcomes. Recent use of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has allowed for nuanced examination of the mechanisms of mood and impulsivity dysregulation. However, few existing studies have used an ecological momentary assessment of impulsivity in multiplex families with BD and examined its associations with mood.
Using EMA, this study investigated the concurrent and predictive relationships between impulsivity and mood.
Multiplex family members with BD (BDF, n = 8), unaffected family members (FC, n = 6), individuals with BD not from families (BDC, n = 8) and healthy controls (HC, n = 8), completed daily EMA surveys about mood and impulsivity for 6-12 weeks. Mixed-effects regression concurrent and lagged models were employed to analyze the relationship between impulsivity and mood.
The BDF (Diff = -31.70, p = 0.001) and BDC (Diff = -25.74, p = 0.007) groups had a significantly lower mean in mood scores compared to the HC group but not compared to the FC group. There were no significant differences in the mean impulsivity scores between the groups. Time-lagged analyses revealed a significant negative association between prior impulsivity and mood at the next assessment independent of diagnosis (OR=0.939, p = 0.002). However, the opposite relationship between prior mood and impulsivity was not significant (OR=0.996, p = 0.135).
These results contribute to the understanding of the complex interactions between BD, the genetic load of the disorder, impulsivity and mood. Furthermore, these findings indicate the potential benefits of addressing impulsivity as a means to improve mood outcomes at an early stage.
冲动性是双相情感障碍(BD)的一个关键特征,与各种负面结果相关。近期使用的生态瞬时评估(EMA)使得对情绪和冲动性失调机制的细致研究成为可能。然而,现有研究中很少有对患有BD的多重家庭进行冲动性的生态瞬时评估,并研究其与情绪的关联。
本研究使用EMA来探究冲动性与情绪之间的共时性和预测性关联。
患有BD的多重家庭成员(BDF,n = 8)、未患病的家庭成员(FC,n = 6)、非来自家庭的BD患者(BDC,n = 8)以及健康对照者(HC,n = 8),连续6至12周每天完成关于情绪和冲动性的EMA调查。采用混合效应回归共时性和滞后模型来分析冲动性与情绪之间的关系。
与HC组相比,BDF组(差异=-31.70,p = 0.001)和BDC组(差异=-25.74,p = 0.007)的情绪得分均值显著更低,但与FC组相比则不然。各组之间的冲动性得分均值无显著差异。时间滞后分析显示,独立于诊断之外,前一次评估时的冲动性与下一次评估时的情绪之间存在显著的负相关(OR = 0.939,p = 0.002)。然而,前一次评估时的情绪与冲动性之间的相反关系并不显著(OR = 0.996,p = 0.135)。
这些结果有助于理解BD、该疾病的遗传负荷、冲动性和情绪之间的复杂相互作用。此外,这些发现表明将冲动性作为改善早期情绪结果的一种手段可能具有的益处。