Garrido-Elustondo Sofía, Reneses Blanca, Navalón Aida, Martín Olga, Ramos Isabel, Fuentes Manuel
Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISECC). Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Madrid, España.
Instituto de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Instituto de Investigación (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, España.
Aten Primaria. 2016 Aug-Sep;48(7):449-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2015.09.009. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
To determine the ability of family physicians to detect psychiatric disorders, comparing the presence of psychiatric disorders detected using validated tests and referrals by family physicians.
Cross-sectional, two-phase study.
Primary healthcare centres in an urban area of Madrid.
Patients between 18 and 65years attending primary healthcare centres for non-administrative purposes.
To detect psychiatric disorders in the waiting room, an interview was performed using GHQ-28 and MULTICAGE CAD-4 in the screening phase (considered positive: score of 6 or higher on the GHQ-28 or a score 2 or higher on MULTICAGE CAD-4). Patients with a positive score and 20% with negative were recruited for the second phase (case identification) using MINI interview. During family physician consultation, the patient gave his doctor a card with an identification number to record the presence of psychiatric illness in his/her opinion and whether there was treatment with psychotropic drugs.
A total of 628 subjects participated. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders corrected by two phase methodology was 31.7% (95%CI: 27.9 to 35.5). Of the 185 patients with a psychiatric disorder detected, 44.2% (95%CI: 36.7 to 51.7) were identified as patients with psychiatric disorders by their family physician. Disorders best detected were: hypomania, dysthymic disorder, depressive episode with melancholic symptoms, and panic disorder.
A significant percentage of patients with possible psychiatric disorders detected with validated test have not been identified by their family physician.
通过比较使用经过验证的测试所检测出的精神障碍情况与家庭医生的转诊情况,来确定家庭医生检测精神障碍的能力。
横断面两阶段研究。
马德里市区的初级医疗保健中心。
因非行政目的前往初级医疗保健中心就诊的18至65岁患者。
在筛查阶段,在候诊室使用一般健康问卷-28(GHQ-28)和多维度成瘾筛查试验-4(MULTICAGE CAD-4)进行访谈以检测精神障碍(判定为阳性:GHQ-28得分6分或更高,或MULTICAGE CAD-4得分2分或更高)。得分阳性的患者以及20%得分阴性的患者被招募进入第二阶段(病例识别),使用简明国际神经精神访谈(MINI)进行访谈。在家庭医生会诊期间,患者给医生一张带有识别号码的卡片,以记录医生认为患者是否存在精神疾病以及是否正在使用精神药物进行治疗。
共有628名受试者参与。采用两阶段方法校正后的精神障碍患病率为31.7%(95%置信区间:27.9%至35.5%)。在检测出患有精神障碍的185名患者中,44.2%(95%置信区间:36.7%至51.7%)被其家庭医生识别为患有精神障碍的患者。最易被检测出的障碍为:轻躁狂、恶劣心境障碍、伴有 melancholic 症状的抑郁发作以及惊恐障碍。
通过经过验证的测试检测出的可能患有精神障碍的患者中,有相当比例未被其家庭医生识别出来。