Zwipp H, Hoffmann R, Wippermann B, Thermann H, Gottschalk F
Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.
Orthopade. 1989 Aug;18(4):336-40; discussion 340-1.
A prospective randomized trial was performed to compare conservative functional treatment and operative functional treatment for rupture of the lateral ankle ligament. On the basis of the results observed 1 and 2 years after injury, primary functional therapy with a orthetic support appeared to be the method of choice. In a 100-point clinical check-up scale we were not able to find any statistical differences between the treatments. This type of conservative treatment gives a high degree of mechanical stability, a shorter time off work and the ability to take a full, active part in sports within 3 months in all cases. Operative treatment is indicated only in cases of dislocation of the foot and ankle, ankle ligament rupture with additional osteochondral talus fracture, and second-stage injuries or reruptures.
进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,以比较外侧踝关节韧带断裂的保守功能治疗和手术功能治疗。根据受伤后1年和2年观察到的结果,使用矫形支具进行的初步功能治疗似乎是首选方法。在100分的临床检查量表中,我们未能发现两种治疗方法之间存在任何统计学差异。这种保守治疗方式具有高度的机械稳定性、较短的停工时间,并且在所有情况下都能在3个月内充分、积极地参与体育运动。手术治疗仅适用于足踝脱位、伴有距骨骨软骨骨折的踝关节韧带断裂,以及二期损伤或再次断裂的情况。