Chang Brian L, Wilson Anthony J, Taglienti Anthony J, Chang Catherine S, Folsom Nancy, Percec Ivona
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jul;36(7):810-20. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv244. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
There are numerous methods of assessing patient satisfaction with botulinum toxin type A neuromodulation of the glabellar rhytids. As the use of aesthetic neuromodulation increases both in breadth and number of procedures, there is a need for more comprehensive tools to evaluate patient-reported outcomes. The FACE-Q is a recently validated patient-reported outcome instrument that can be used to measure patient perceptions of botulinum toxin type A neuromodulation.
This study used the FACE-Q to assess patient satisfaction following botulinum toxin type A neuromodulation of the glabellar rhytids.
57 female patients completed the FACE-Q, a survey that evaluates patients' satisfaction with their facial appearance. After this baseline survey, the patients received injections of one of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox, Allergan, Dublin, Ireland), abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport, Galderma, Lausanne, Switzerland), or incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) in the glabella. Two weeks post-injection, the patients completed the FACE-Q again. The percentage changes in patient responses were tabulated to determine how neuromodulation affects patient satisfaction with their facial appearance. The percentage changes for each of the neurotoxin groups were compared to determine if patient satisfaction with neuromodulation varies with the type of neurotoxin.
Patient satisfaction with their overall facial appearance increased by 28% following neuromodulation. Patients stated that they believe they look an average of 5.6 years younger post-neuromodulation. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups.
The FACE-Q demonstrates that patients are more satisfied by their overall facial appearance and age appearance following neuromodulation of their glabellar rhytids. Patients are equally satisfied with the improvement of their facial appearance regardless of which neurotoxin they received. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2: Therapeutic.
评估患者对A型肉毒毒素改善眉间皱纹神经调节治疗的满意度有多种方法。随着美容神经调节治疗在广度和手术数量上的增加,需要更全面的工具来评估患者报告的结果。面部质量问卷(FACE-Q)是一种最近经过验证的患者报告结果工具,可用于测量患者对A型肉毒毒素神经调节治疗的看法。
本研究使用面部质量问卷(FACE-Q)评估A型肉毒毒素改善眉间皱纹神经调节治疗后的患者满意度。
57名女性患者完成了面部质量问卷(FACE-Q),这是一项评估患者对面部外观满意度的调查。在这项基线调查之后,患者在眉间接受了注射用A型肉毒毒素(保妥适,艾尔建公司,爱尔兰都柏林)、A型肉毒毒素(丽舒妥,高德美公司,瑞士洛桑)或A型肉毒毒素(吉适,默克雪兰诺公司,德国美因河畔法兰克福)中的一种。注射后两周,患者再次完成面部质量问卷(FACE-Q)。将患者回答的百分比变化制成表格,以确定神经调节如何影响患者对面部外观的满意度。比较每个神经毒素组的百分比变化,以确定患者对神经调节的满意度是否因神经毒素类型而异。
神经调节治疗后,患者对整体面部外观的满意度提高了28%。患者表示,他们认为神经调节治疗后平均看起来年轻了5.6岁。各治疗组之间没有显著差异。
面部质量问卷(FACE-Q)表明,患者在眉间皱纹接受神经调节治疗后,对整体面部外观和年龄外观更满意。无论接受哪种神经毒素治疗,患者对面部外观改善的满意度相同。证据水平2:治疗性。