Suppr超能文献

当前麻醉实践中的颈椎硬膜外镇痛:对其临床效用、理论依据及技术考量的系统评价

Cervical epidural analgesia in current anaesthesia practice: systematic review of its clinical utility and rationale, and technical considerations.

作者信息

Shanthanna H, Mendis N, Goel A

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, St Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):192-207. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev453.

Abstract

Cervical epidural analgesia (CEA) is an analgesic technique, potentially useful for surgeries involving the upper body. Despite the inherent technical risks and systemic changes, it has been used for various surgeries. There have been no previously published systematic reviews aimed at assessing its clinical utility. This systematic review was performed to explore the perioperative benefits of CEA. The review was also aimed at identifying the rationale of its use, reported surgical indications and the method of use. We performed a literature search involving PubMed and Embase databases, to identify studies using CEA for surgical indications. Out of 467 potentially relevant articles, 73 articles were selected. Two independent investigators extracted data involving 5 randomized controlled trials, 17 observational comparative trials, and 51 case reports (series). The outcomes studied in most comparative studies were on effects of local anaesthetics and other agents, systemic effects, and feasibility of CEA. In one randomized controlled study, CEA was observed to decrease the resting pain scores after pharyngo-laryngeal surgeries. In a retrospective study, CEA was shown to decrease the cancer recurrence after pharyngeal-hypopharyngeal surgeries. The limited evidence, small studies, and the chosen outcomes do not allow for any specific recommendations based on the relative benefit or harm of CEA. Considering the potential for significant harm, in the face of better alternatives, its use must have a strong rationale mostly supported by unique patient and surgical demands. Future studies must aim to assess analgesic comparator effectiveness for clinically relevant outcomes.

摘要

颈椎硬膜外镇痛(CEA)是一种镇痛技术,对上半身手术可能有用。尽管存在固有的技术风险和全身变化,但它已被用于各种手术。此前尚无旨在评估其临床效用的系统评价。本系统评价旨在探讨CEA的围手术期益处。该评价还旨在确定其使用的基本原理、报告的手术适应症和使用方法。我们进行了一项文献检索,涉及PubMed和Embase数据库,以识别使用CEA治疗手术适应症的研究。在467篇可能相关的文章中,筛选出73篇文章。两名独立研究者提取了涉及5项随机对照试验、17项观察性比较试验和51例病例报告(系列)的数据。大多数比较研究中所研究的结果涉及局部麻醉药和其他药物的效果、全身影响以及CEA的可行性。在一项随机对照研究中,观察到CEA可降低咽喉部手术后的静息疼痛评分。在一项回顾性研究中,CEA显示可降低下咽-下咽手术后的癌症复发率。证据有限、研究规模小以及所选结果不允许基于CEA的相对益处或危害提出任何具体建议。考虑到存在重大危害的可能性,面对更好的替代方案,其使用必须有强有力的基本原理,且大多得到独特的患者和手术需求的支持。未来的研究必须旨在评估镇痛比较器对临床相关结果的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验