van de Groes Sebastiaan, van der Ven Paul, Kremers-van de Hei Keetie, Koëter Sander, Verdonschot Nico
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Dec;81(4):730-7.
Special high-flexion prosthetic designs show a small increase in postoperative flexion compared to standard designs and some papers show increased anterior knee pain with these prosthesis.
A prospective double blind randomized controlled trial investigates the difference in flexion and anterior knee pain between standard and high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. In total 47 patients were randomly allocated to a standard cruciate retaining fixed bearing design (CR) in 23 patients and to a high-flexion posterior stabilized mobile bearing design (HF-PS) in 24 patients.
The HF-PS did show a significantly higher passive postoperative flexion; 120.8° (SD 10.3°) vs. 112.0° (SD 9.5°) for the CR group (p = 0.004). The active postoperative flexion, VAS-pain score and Feller score did not show significant differences between both groups. Sub analysis with the HF-PS group showed a higher VAS-pain for the patients achieving ≥130° of flexion; 30.5 (SD 32.2) vs. 12.2 (SD 12.5) (p = 0.16).
The present study showed a significant higher passive flexion in the high-flexion prosthesis compared to the standard prosthesis. However this difference disappeared when comparing active flexion. No difference in anterior knee pain was found between both groups.
与标准设计相比,特殊的高屈曲假体设计在术后屈曲方面有小幅增加,且一些论文显示使用这些假体时前膝疼痛会增加。
一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验研究了标准全膝关节置换术和高屈曲全膝关节置换术在屈曲和前膝疼痛方面的差异。总共47例患者被随机分配,23例患者采用标准的保留交叉韧带固定承重设计(CR),24例患者采用高屈曲后稳定活动承重设计(HF-PS)。
HF-PS组术后被动屈曲角度显著更高;CR组为112.0°(标准差9.5°),HF-PS组为120.8°(标准差10.3°)(p = 0.004)。两组术后主动屈曲、视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分和费勒评分均无显著差异。对HF-PS组的亚组分析显示,屈曲≥130°的患者视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分更高;分别为30.5(标准差32.2)和12.2(标准差12.5)(p = 0.16)。
本研究表明,与标准假体相比,高屈曲假体的被动屈曲角度显著更高。然而,在比较主动屈曲时,这种差异消失了。两组在前膝疼痛方面未发现差异。