Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 May;141(5):783-793. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03481-9. Epub 2020 May 24.
The aim of this study is to provide an updated meta-analysis comparing the benefits and clinical outcomes between high flexion (HF)-TKA and standard (S)-TKA.
A detailed database analysis was carried out using Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Clinicaltrial.gov, to identify eligible studies. The meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed using Review Manager 5.3 software and STATA 12.0.
Twenty-two randomized control trials (RCTs), including 2841 patients and 4268 knees, were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled results of subgroup analysis reveal that there was significant difference between HF-TKA and S-TKA in each subgroup in terms of postoperative ROM, with a higher degree of knee flexion for HF-TKA than S-TKA. However, no statistical difference was identified between HF-TKA and S-TKA in other clinical outcomes including various functional scores and complications.
On the basis of this meta-analysis, we can recommended HF-TKA as an alternative choice to S-TKA for patients requiring higher knee flexion in their daily activities.
本研究旨在提供一项更新的荟萃分析,比较高屈曲(HF)-TKA 和标准(S)-TKA 的益处和临床结果。
使用 Web of Science、PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、MEDLINE 和 Clinicaltrial.gov 进行详细的数据库分析,以确定符合条件的研究。使用 Review Manager 5.3 软件和 STATA 12.0 进行荟萃分析和敏感性分析。
共有 22 项随机对照试验(RCT),包括 2841 名患者和 4268 个膝关节,符合荟萃分析的条件。亚组分析的汇总结果显示,HF-TKA 和 S-TKA 在术后 ROM 方面的每个亚组之间存在显著差异,HF-TKA 的膝关节屈曲程度高于 S-TKA。然而,HF-TKA 和 S-TKA 在其他临床结果方面,包括各种功能评分和并发症方面,没有统计学差异。
基于这项荟萃分析,我们可以推荐 HF-TKA 作为 S-TKA 的替代选择,适用于在日常生活中需要更高膝关节屈曲度的患者。