Chen Mingsheng, Palmer Andrew J, Si Lei
School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, Hanzhong Road 140, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, PR China.
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Medical Science 1 Building, 17 Liverpool St (Private Bag 23), Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 20;15:15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0306-z.
Improving the equitable benefit distribution of government health subsidies, particularly among the country's poorer socioeconomic groups, is a major goal of China's healthcare sector reform.
Benefit incidence analysis was employed to measure the distribution of government health subsidies by income quintile. The concentration index (CI) of different levels of health care facility in urban and rural areas was calculated. A household survey complete through multistage stratified sampling was conducted in 2013 in urban areas (16,908 respondents) and rural areas (19,525 respondents).
The overall CI for urban patients was 0.1068 for outpatient care and 0.1237 for inpatient care. For outpatient care, the CI was 0.0795, 0.0465 and 0.3456, respectively, at primary, secondary and tertiary health care facilities; for inpatient care, the CI was -0.2179, 0.0752 and 0.2883 at the corresponding facility levels. The overall CI for rural outpatients was -0.0659 and 0.0036 for inpatients. For outpatient care, the CI was -0.0818, 0.0567 and 0.0271 at primary, secondary and tertiary facilities, respectively; for inpatient care, the CI was -0.0050, 0.0084 and 0.0252 at the corresponding facility levels.
China's primary level health care facilities were found to have a more equitable benefit distribution of government health subsidies than the secondary- and tertiary- level facilities. Increased government budget allocations and insurance imbursement rates, and the provision of technical support and qualified medical staff to lower-level hospitals were key factors. However, the provision of equal subsidies to all socioeconomic levels was found to be a potential threat to the equity of government health subsidy distribution.
改善政府医疗补贴的公平受益分配,尤其是在该国社会经济较贫困群体中,是中国医疗部门改革的主要目标。
采用受益归宿分析来衡量按收入五分位数划分的政府医疗补贴分配情况。计算了城乡不同级别医疗机构的集中指数(CI)。2013年通过多阶段分层抽样在城市地区(16908名受访者)和农村地区(19525名受访者)进行了家庭调查。
城市患者门诊治疗的总体CI为0.1068,住院治疗为0.1237。对于门诊治疗,基层、二级和三级医疗机构的CI分别为0.0795、0.0465和0.3456;对于住院治疗,相应机构级别的CI分别为-0.2179、0.0752和0.2883。农村门诊患者的总体CI为-0.0659,住院患者为0.0036。对于门诊治疗,基层、二级和三级医疗机构的CI分别为-0.0818、0.0567和0.0271;对于住院治疗,相应机构级别的CI分别为-0.0050、0.0084和0.0252。
发现中国基层医疗机构在政府医疗补贴的受益分配上比二级和三级医疗机构更公平。增加政府预算拨款和保险报销率,以及为基层医院提供技术支持和合格医务人员是关键因素。然而,向所有社会经济阶层提供平等补贴被发现是政府医疗补贴分配公平性的一个潜在威胁。