Lusk M Josephine, Garden Frances L, Cumming Robert G, Rawlinson William D, Naing Zin W, Konecny Pam
1 Short Street Centre, Department of Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Sexual Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia.
2 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, Australia.
Int J STD AIDS. 2017 Feb;28(2):120-126. doi: 10.1177/0956462416628319. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
Treatment with 1 G azithromycin was observed prospectively in 130 women with cervicitis (>30 polymorphonuclear leucocytes/high-powered field) enrolled in a cervicitis aetiology study of 558 women at three sexually transmitted infection clinics in Sydney, Australia. Two overlapping groups of women with cervicitis were considered: 'cervicitis group 1' (n = 116) excluded women with Trichomonas vaginalis and a subgroup of this, 'cervicitis group 2' (non-specific cervicitis) (n = 96) further excluded women with Neisseria gonorrhoea, Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium at enrolment. Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium and Trichomonas vaginalis was by PCR and Neisseria gonorrhoea by PCR and culture. Treatment outcomes were cervicitis or vaginal symptoms at follow-up. Effect on cervicitis at follow-up was also assessed after additional reported partner treatment. In 'cervicitis group 1' where prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium and/or Chlamydia trachomatis was 23/116 (19.8%), azithromycin reduced cervicitis at follow-up (RR = 0.62 (95% CI 0.39-0.97) p = 0.035), but there was no significant effect in non-specific cervicitis ('cervicitis group 2') (RR = 0.60 (95% CI 0.35-1.01) p = 0.056). Empiric treatment did not reduce vaginal symptoms at follow-up in either group. No effect of empiric partner treatment was seen. The conclusion was that empiric azithromycin treatment of cervicitis reduces cervicitis at follow-up in populations with high prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and/or Mycoplasma genitalium. There are no benefits of empiric azithromycin for non-specific cervicitis or empiric partner treatment.
在澳大利亚悉尼的三家性传播感染诊所对558名女性进行宫颈炎病因研究时,前瞻性观察了130名患有宫颈炎(每高倍视野多形核白细胞>30个)的女性接受1克阿奇霉素治疗的情况。将两组重叠的宫颈炎女性纳入研究:“宫颈炎组1”(n = 116)排除了阴道毛滴虫感染的女性,该组的一个亚组“宫颈炎组2”(非特异性宫颈炎)(n = 96)在入组时进一步排除了淋病奈瑟菌、沙眼衣原体和生殖支原体感染的女性。沙眼衣原体、生殖支原体和阴道毛滴虫的检测采用聚合酶链反应(PCR),淋病奈瑟菌的检测采用PCR和培养。治疗结局为随访时的宫颈炎或阴道症状。在报告对性伴侣进行额外治疗后,也评估了对随访时宫颈炎的影响。在生殖支原体和/或沙眼衣原体感染率为23/116(19.8%)的“宫颈炎组1”中,阿奇霉素降低了随访时的宫颈炎(相对危险度RR = 0.62(95%置信区间0.39 - 0.97),p = 0.035),但在非特异性宫颈炎(“宫颈炎组2”)中没有显著效果(RR = 0.60(95%置信区间0.35 - 1.01),p = 0.056)。经验性治疗在两组随访时均未减轻阴道症状。未观察到经验性性伴侣治疗的效果。结论是,对宫颈炎进行经验性阿奇霉素治疗可降低沙眼衣原体和/或生殖支原体感染率高的人群随访时的宫颈炎。经验性阿奇霉素治疗对非特异性宫颈炎或经验性性伴侣治疗没有益处。