Hameed Waqas, Azmat Syed Khurram, Ishaque Muhammad, Hussain Wajahat, Munroe Erik, Mustafa Ghulam, Khan Omar Farooq, Abbas Ghazunfer, Ali Safdar, Asghar Qaiser Jamshaid, Ali Sajid, Ahmed Aftab, Hamza Hasan Bin
Marie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Department of Urogynecology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 25;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0040-9.
Long-acting reversible contraceptives, such as the intrauterine device (IUD), remain underutilised in Pakistan with high discontinuation rates. Based on a 24-month prospective client follow-up (nested within a larger quasi-experimental study), this paper presents the comparison of two intervention models, one using private mid-level providers branded as "Suraj" and the other using community midwives (CMWs) of Maternal Newborn and Child Health Programme, for method continuation among IUD users. Moreover, determinants of IUD continuation and the reasons for discontinuation, and switching behaviour were studied within each arm.
A total of 1,163 IUD users, 824 from Suraj and 339 from the CMW model, were enrolled in this 24-month prospective client follow-up. Participants were followed-up by female community mobilisers physically every second month to ascertain continued IUD usage and to collect information on associated factors, switching behaviour, reasons for discontinuation, and pregnancy occurrence. The probabilities of IUD continuation and the risk factors for discontinuation were estimated by life table analysis and Cox proportional-hazard techniques, respectively.
The cumulative probabilities of IUD continuation at 24 months in Suraj and CMW models were 82% and 80%, respectively. The difference between the two intervention areas was not significant. The probability distributions of IUD continuation were also similar in both interventions (Log rank test: χ(2) = 0.06, df = 1, P = 0.81; Breslow test: χ(2) = 0.6, df = 1, P = 0.44). Health concerns (Suraj = 57.1%, CMW = 38.7%) and pregnancy desire (Suraj = 29.3%, CMW = 40.3%) were reported as the most prominent reasons for IUD discontinuation in both intervention arms. IUD discontinuation was significantly associated with place of residence in Suraj and with age (15-25 years) in the CMW model.
CMWs and private providers are equally capable of providing quality IUD services and ensuring higher method continuation. Pakistan's National Maternal Newborn and Child Health programme should consider training CMWs and providing IUDs through them. Moreover, private sector mid-level providers could be engaged in promoting the use of IUDs.
长效可逆避孕方法,如宫内节育器(IUD),在巴基斯坦的使用率仍然较低,停用率很高。基于一项为期24个月的前瞻性客户随访研究(嵌套在一项更大的准实验研究中),本文比较了两种干预模式,一种是使用名为“苏雷杰”的私立中级医疗服务提供者,另一种是使用母婴和儿童健康项目的社区助产士(CMW),以比较宫内节育器使用者的方法持续使用情况。此外,还在每个组内研究了宫内节育器持续使用的决定因素、停用原因及更换行为。
共有1163名宫内节育器使用者参与了这项为期24个月的前瞻性客户随访研究,其中824名来自苏雷杰模式,339名来自社区助产士模式。女性社区动员者每两个月对参与者进行一次实地随访,以确定宫内节育器的持续使用情况,并收集有关相关因素、更换行为、停用原因和妊娠发生情况的信息。宫内节育器持续使用的概率和停用的风险因素分别通过生命表分析和Cox比例风险技术进行估计。
在24个月时,苏雷杰模式和社区助产士模式下宫内节育器持续使用的累积概率分别为82%和80%。两个干预地区之间的差异不显著。两种干预措施中宫内节育器持续使用的概率分布也相似(对数秩检验:χ(2)=0.06,自由度=1,P=0.81;Breslow检验:χ(2)=0.6,自由度=1,P=0.44)。在两个干预组中,健康问题(苏雷杰模式=57.1%,社区助产士模式=38.7%)和生育意愿(苏雷杰模式=29.3%,社区助产士模式=40.3%)被报告为宫内节育器停用的最主要原因。在苏雷杰模式中,宫内节育器停用与居住地点显著相关,在社区助产士模式中与年龄(15 - 25岁)显著相关。
社区助产士和私立医疗服务提供者在提供优质宫内节育器服务和确保更高的方法持续使用方面同样有能力。巴基斯坦国家母婴和儿童健康项目应考虑培训社区助产士并通过她们提供宫内节育器。此外,私营部门的中级医疗服务提供者可以参与推广宫内节育器的使用。