Jacobson L, Kokri M S, Pridie A K
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Sep;71(5):289-92.
A randomised double-blind study compared the dose-response relationship of intrathecal diamorphine (0, 0.25, 0.75, 1.5, and 2.5 mg) for postoperative pain relief, in 35 subjects who underwent total knee replacement surgery. Assessments commenced 2 h after the opioid injection and continued for 20 h. Pain, analgesic effect, supplementary analgesic requirements and adverse effects were noted. Intrathecal diamorphine was unable to delay the initial perception of discomfort. It was, however, capable of postponing the onset of severe pain requiring analgesic supplementation (control 5.25 h vs approximately 8 h: P less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in the quality of analgesia between the groups. Pruritus was the only undesirable feature unique to intrathecal diamorphine administration. Intrathecal diamorphine was safe and was not associated with clinically apparent respiratory depression. Its effects were inconsistent and its use was associated with irritating side effects. Possible explanations for the erratic behaviour of the diamorphine are discussed.
一项随机双盲研究比较了鞘内注射二氢吗啡酮(0、0.25、0.75、1.5和2.5毫克)对35例行全膝关节置换手术患者术后疼痛缓解的剂量反应关系。评估在阿片类药物注射后2小时开始,持续20小时。记录疼痛、镇痛效果、补充镇痛药需求和不良反应。鞘内注射二氢吗啡酮无法延迟对不适的最初感知。然而,它能够推迟需要补充镇痛药的严重疼痛的发作(对照组为5.25小时,而二氢吗啡酮组约为8小时:P<0.05)。各组之间的镇痛质量没有显著差异。瘙痒是鞘内注射二氢吗啡酮唯一特有的不良特征。鞘内注射二氢吗啡酮是安全的,且与临床上明显的呼吸抑制无关。其效果不一致,且使用时伴有刺激性副作用。文中讨论了二氢吗啡酮行为不稳定的可能原因。