Jensen Jeppe Thue, Hornslet Pernille, Konge Lars, Møller Ann Merete, Vilmann Peter
Gastro unit D, Department of endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Denmark.
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jan;4(1):E107-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107899. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
Whereas data on moderate nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) efficacy and safety for standard endoscopy is abundant, few reports on the use of deep sedation by endoscopy nurses during advanced endoscopy, such as Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) are available and potential benefits or hazards remain unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the efficacy of intermittent deep sedation with propofol for a large cohort of advanced endoscopies and to provide data on the safety.
All available data from patients sedated with intermittent deep NAPS for ERCP, EUS or double balloon enteroscopy (DBE, since the method was implemented in May 2007 through December 2012 were included for evaluation in a retrospective case-control design.
Data from 1899 patients undergoing 1899 procedures were included for evaluation. All but one procedure were completed with intermittent deep NAPS. The mean propofol dose was 397 mg (SD: 232.4) and the infusion rate was 23.9 mg/kg. The frequency of hypoxia was 4.3 % and 20 patients needed assisted ventilation (1.1 %). Anesthesiologic support was requested eight times (0.4 %). One patient was intubated due to suspected aspiration.
Intermittent deep NAPS for advanced endoscopies in selected patients provided an almost 100 % success rate. However, the rate of hypoxia, hypotension and respiratory support was high compared with previously published data, but the method was still assessed as safe.
关于标准内镜检查中由护士实施的适度丙泊酚镇静(NAPS)的疗效和安全性数据丰富,但关于内镜护士在诸如内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)和内镜超声检查(EUS)等高级内镜检查中使用深度镇静的报道较少,其潜在益处或危害仍不明确。本研究的目的是调查丙泊酚间歇性深度镇静对大量高级内镜检查患者的疗效,并提供安全性数据。
采用回顾性病例对照设计,纳入2007年5月至2012年12月期间因ERCP、EUS或双气囊小肠镜检查(DBE,自该方法实施起)接受间歇性深度NAPS镇静的所有患者的可用数据进行评估。
纳入1899例接受1899项操作的患者数据进行评估。除1例操作外,其余均通过间歇性深度NAPS完成。丙泊酚平均剂量为397mg(标准差:232.4),输注速率为23.9mg/kg。低氧发生率为4.3%,20例患者需要辅助通气(1.1%)。8次请求麻醉支持(0.4%)。1例患者因疑似误吸行气管插管。
在选定患者中,间歇性深度NAPS用于高级内镜检查的成功率几乎达到100%。然而,与先前发表的数据相比,低氧、低血压和呼吸支持发生率较高,但该方法仍被评估为安全。