Suppr超能文献

深度护士给予丙泊酚镇静用于晚期胃肠内镜手术时疗效显著。

High efficacy with deep nurse-administered propofol sedation for advanced gastroenterologic endoscopic procedures.

作者信息

Jensen Jeppe Thue, Hornslet Pernille, Konge Lars, Møller Ann Merete, Vilmann Peter

机构信息

Gastro unit D, Department of endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Denmark.

Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jan;4(1):E107-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107899. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Whereas data on moderate nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) efficacy and safety for standard endoscopy is abundant, few reports on the use of deep sedation by endoscopy nurses during advanced endoscopy, such as Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) are available and potential benefits or hazards remain unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the efficacy of intermittent deep sedation with propofol for a large cohort of advanced endoscopies and to provide data on the safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All available data from patients sedated with intermittent deep NAPS for ERCP, EUS or double balloon enteroscopy (DBE, since the method was implemented in May 2007 through December 2012 were included for evaluation in a retrospective case-control design.

RESULTS

Data from 1899 patients undergoing 1899 procedures were included for evaluation. All but one procedure were completed with intermittent deep NAPS. The mean propofol dose was 397 mg (SD: 232.4) and the infusion rate was 23.9 mg/kg. The frequency of hypoxia was 4.3 % and 20 patients needed assisted ventilation (1.1 %). Anesthesiologic support was requested eight times (0.4 %). One patient was intubated due to suspected aspiration.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent deep NAPS for advanced endoscopies in selected patients provided an almost 100 % success rate. However, the rate of hypoxia, hypotension and respiratory support was high compared with previously published data, but the method was still assessed as safe.

摘要

背景与研究目的

关于标准内镜检查中由护士实施的适度丙泊酚镇静(NAPS)的疗效和安全性数据丰富,但关于内镜护士在诸如内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)和内镜超声检查(EUS)等高级内镜检查中使用深度镇静的报道较少,其潜在益处或危害仍不明确。本研究的目的是调查丙泊酚间歇性深度镇静对大量高级内镜检查患者的疗效,并提供安全性数据。

患者与方法

采用回顾性病例对照设计,纳入2007年5月至2012年12月期间因ERCP、EUS或双气囊小肠镜检查(DBE,自该方法实施起)接受间歇性深度NAPS镇静的所有患者的可用数据进行评估。

结果

纳入1899例接受1899项操作的患者数据进行评估。除1例操作外,其余均通过间歇性深度NAPS完成。丙泊酚平均剂量为397mg(标准差:232.4),输注速率为23.9mg/kg。低氧发生率为4.3%,20例患者需要辅助通气(1.1%)。8次请求麻醉支持(0.4%)。1例患者因疑似误吸行气管插管。

结论

在选定患者中,间歇性深度NAPS用于高级内镜检查的成功率几乎达到100%。然而,与先前发表的数据相比,低氧、低血压和呼吸支持发生率较高,但该方法仍被评估为安全。

相似文献

1
High efficacy with deep nurse-administered propofol sedation for advanced gastroenterologic endoscopic procedures.
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jan;4(1):E107-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107899. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
4
Nurse-administered propofol sedation for endoscopy: a risk analysis during an implementation phase.
Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):716-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256515. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
6
Periprocedural Role of Nurses During Interventional Endoscopic Procedures Under Deep Sedation.
Curr Health Sci J. 2018 Jan-Mar;44(1):14-18. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.44.01.02. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Propofol-Mediated Sedation for Outpatient Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Jun;61(6):1686-91. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4043-3. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
9
Nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopic ultrasonography.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul;103(7):1649-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01906.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
10
Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;8(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

5
Controversies in ERCP: Indications and preparation.
Endosc Ultrasound. 2022 May-Jun;11(3):186-200. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00106.
6
Standard reporting elements for the performance of EUS: Recommendations from the FOCUS working group.
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Mar-Apr;10(2):84-92. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-20-00234.
8
Periprocedural Role of Nurses During Interventional Endoscopic Procedures Under Deep Sedation.
Curr Health Sci J. 2018 Jan-Mar;44(1):14-18. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.44.01.02. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
9
How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jul;6(13):266. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.36.
10
Paradigm shift: should the elderly undergo propofol sedation for DBE? A prospective cohort study.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;9(3):192-199. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100847. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

3
Propofol use in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 14;20(18):5171-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5171.
4
ERCP: the unresolved question of endotracheal intubation.
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Mar;59(3):513-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2931-3. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
6
Deep sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 14;19(22):3439-46. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3439.
7
Sedation-associated complications in endoscopy--prospective multicentre survey of 191142 patients.
Z Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;51(6):568-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330441. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
8
Comparison of moderate versus deep sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Apr;10(2):121-6. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201209-074OC.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验