• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient satisfaction and safety in the administration of sedation by nursing staff in the digestive endoscopy service: a cross-sectional study.消化内镜服务中护理人员实施镇静的患者满意度与安全性:一项横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 28;23(1):953. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02644-y.
2
Training and Resources Related to the Administration of Sedation by Nurses During Digestive Endoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.护士在消化内镜检查期间实施镇静的培训与资源:一项横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;12(20):2087. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202087.
3
Nurse-Administered Sedation in Digestive Endoscopy: A Systematic Review.消化内镜检查中护士实施的镇静:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;15(8):1030. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081030.
4
Assessment of the Quality of Outpatient Endoscopic Procedures by Using a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.使用患者满意度调查问卷评估门诊内镜检查程序的质量
Curr Health Sci J. 2019 Jan-Mar;45(1):52-58. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.45.01.07. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
5
Effects of listening to music in digestive endoscopy: A prospective intervention study led by nursing.音乐对消化内镜检查的影响:一项由护理主导的前瞻性干预研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Nov;76(11):2993-3002. doi: 10.1111/jan.14516. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Efficacy and safety of midazolam combined with dezocine for sedation and analgesia in digestive endoscopy: A prospective open single-center study.咪达唑仑联合地佐辛用于消化内镜检查镇静镇痛的疗效及安全性:一项前瞻性开放单中心研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 3;13:945597. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.945597. eCollection 2022.
7
Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients.护士给予丙泊酚与咪达唑仑和哌替啶用于肝硬化患者上消化道内镜检查的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Nov;98(11):2440-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08668.x.
8
Implementation of sedation guidelines in clinical practice in Italy: results of a prospective longitudinal multicenter study.意大利临床实践中镇静指南的实施:一项前瞻性纵向多中心研究的结果
Endoscopy. 2006 Nov;38(11):1137-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944842.
9
The First US Clinical Experience With Computer-Assisted Propofol Sedation: A Retrospective Observational Comparative Study on Efficacy, Safety, Efficiency, and Endoscopist and Patient Satisfaction.美国首例计算机辅助丙泊酚镇静临床经验:一项关于疗效、安全性、效率以及内镜医师和患者满意度的回顾性观察比较研究
Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep;125(3):804-811. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001898.
10
What are the clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of endoscopy undertaken by nurses when compared with doctors? A Multi-Institution Nurse Endoscopy Trial (MINuET).与医生进行的内镜检查相比,护士进行内镜检查的临床结果和成本效益如何?一项多机构护士内镜检查试验(MINuET)。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Oct;10(40):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta10400.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse-Administered Sedation in Digestive Endoscopy: A Systematic Review.消化内镜检查中护士实施的镇静:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;15(8):1030. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081030.

本文引用的文献

1
Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center.在学术医疗中心,比较异丙酚镇静与芬太尼、咪达唑仑和苯海拉明镇静用于内镜和结肠镜检查的操作结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294418. eCollection 2023.
2
Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation Training Curricula and Propofol Administration in Digestive Endoscopy Procedures: A Scoping Review of the Literature.护士主导的异丙酚镇静培训课程和在消化内镜检查程序中的异丙酚给药:文献的范围综述。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2024;47(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000780. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
A scale to measure the worry level in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy with sedation: Development, reliability, and validity.一种测量镇静状态下胃肠内镜检查时焦虑水平的量表:编制、信效度研究
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Oct-Dec;23(4):100410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100410. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
Advances in Analgosedation and Periprocedural Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查的镇痛镇静及围手术期护理进展
Life (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;13(2):473. doi: 10.3390/life13020473.
5
Review of European Guidelines on Palliative Sedation: A Foundation for the Updating of the European Association for Palliative Care Framework.欧洲缓和医疗镇静指南回顾:为更新欧洲姑息治疗协会框架奠定基础。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Nov;25(11):1721-1731. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0646. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
Adoption and Safety Evaluation of Comfortable Nursing by Mobile Internet of Things in Pediatric Outpatient Sedation.移动互联网物联网在儿科门诊镇静中舒适护理的采用和安全性评估。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 25;2022:3257101. doi: 10.1155/2022/3257101. eCollection 2022.
7
Defining competencies for nurse anaesthetists: A Delphi study.界定护士麻醉师的能力:德尔菲研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Nov;78(11):3696-3709. doi: 10.1111/jan.15348. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
8
Retrospective observational study on safety of sedation for colonoscopies in ASA I and II patients performed by a nurse and under the supervision of anesthesiology.对护士进行镇静和麻醉科医生监督下 ASA I 和 II 级患者结肠镜检查的安全性进行回顾性观察性研究。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun-Jul;69(6):319-325. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2021.05.012. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
9
Developments in procedural sedation for adults.成人程序性镇静的进展。
BJA Educ. 2022 Jul;22(7):258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
10
Using Information Videos to Improve Patient Satisfaction in Endoscopy: A Prospective Service Improvement Project.使用信息视频提高内镜检查患者满意度:一项前瞻性服务改进项目。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 13;14(4):e24108. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24108. eCollection 2022 Apr.

消化内镜服务中护理人员实施镇静的患者满意度与安全性:一项横断面研究

Patient satisfaction and safety in the administration of sedation by nursing staff in the digestive endoscopy service: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Hidalgo-Cabanillas Miriam, Laredo-Aguilera José Alberto, Cobo-Cuenca Ana Isabel, Molina-Madueño Rosa María, Santacruz-Salas Esmeralda, Rodriguez-Muñoz Pedro Manuel, Carmona-Torres Juan Manuel

机构信息

Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, 45004, Spain.

Facultad de Fisioterapia y Enfermería, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, 4507, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 28;23(1):953. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02644-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02644-y
PMID:39731089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11681753/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The satisfaction of patients with sedation by nursing staff is an issue of interest for the quality of health care, influencing the recovery and well-being of patients as well as their confidence in and adherence to treatment. One of the most frequently performed diagnostic and therapeutic tests requiring sedation are digestive endoscopies, so it would be interesting to study satisfaction in these services.

AIM

To determine the level of patient satisfaction and safety with sedation via digestive endoscopies by nurses.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study in the Digestive Endoscopy Service at the University Hospital of Toledo, Spain. The sample consisted of 660 adult patients from the digestive endoscopy service who were sedated between June-September 2023. The degree of satisfaction with the service was measured by the questionnaire: Survey of patient satisfaction with the digestive endoscopy service. The study was approved by the ethics committee.

RESULTS

Patients who reported satisfaction with the treatment were very satisfied with the sedation provided by the nurses. The most valued item was the attention of the nursing professionals. The least valued items were the waiting time for the appointment and the time spent in the waiting room on the same day. The incidence of complications recorded during the test were minimal (2% of all patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients are satisfied with the sedation administered by nurses via digestive endoscopies, and complications were rare, supporting the efficacy and acceptance of this practice. Clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents in Spain guarantee that nurses have autonomy to administer sedation in digestive endoscopy services, but there is a lack of national regulations to support this technique. The current consensus in Spain is that specific training is necessary for such nurses.

摘要

背景

患者对护理人员镇静服务的满意度是医疗保健质量方面一个受关注的问题,会影响患者的康复、福祉以及他们对治疗的信心和依从性。需要镇静的最常见诊断和治疗测试之一是消化内镜检查,因此研究这些服务中的满意度会很有意义。

目的

确定护士通过消化内镜检查进行镇静时患者的满意度水平和安全性。

方法

这是一项在西班牙托莱多大学医院消化内镜科进行的横断面研究。样本包括2023年6月至9月期间在消化内镜科接受镇静的660名成年患者。使用问卷《消化内镜服务患者满意度调查》来衡量对该服务的满意度。该研究获得了伦理委员会的批准。

结果

报告对治疗满意的患者对护士提供的镇静非常满意。最受重视的项目是护理专业人员的关注。最不受重视的项目是预约等待时间和当天在候诊室花费的时间。检查期间记录的并发症发生率极低(占所有患者的2%)。

结论

大多数患者对护士通过消化内镜检查给予的镇静感到满意,并发症很少见,这支持了这种做法的有效性和可接受性。西班牙的临床实践指南和共识文件保证护士在消化内镜服务中有自主给予镇静的权力,但缺乏国家法规来支持这项技术。西班牙目前的共识是,此类护士需要接受专门培训。