Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.
Gut Liver. 2012 Oct;6(4):464-70. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.4.464. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a treatment for gastric neoplasms and usually requires deep sedation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy profiles of deep sedation induced by continuous propofol infusion with or without midazolam during ESD.
A total of 135 patients scheduled for ESDs between December 2008 and June 2010 were included in this prospective study and were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the propofol group or the combination group (propofol plus midazolam).
The propofol group reported only one case of severe hypoxemia with no need of mask ventilation or intubation. Additionally, 18 cases of mild hypotension were observed in the propofol group, and 11 cases were observed in the combination group. The combination group had a lower mean total propofol dose (378 mg vs 466 mg, p<0.012), a longer mean recovery time (10.5 minutes vs 7.9 minutes, p=0.027), and a lower frequency of overall adverse events (32.8% vs 17.6%, p=0.042).
Deep sedation induced by continuous propofol infusion was shown to be safe during ESD. The combination of continuous propofol infusion and intermittent midazolam injection can decrease the total dose and infusion rate of propofol and the overall occurrence of adverse events.
背景/目的:内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)被认为是治疗胃肿瘤的一种方法,通常需要深度镇静。本研究旨在评估在 ESD 期间持续输注丙泊酚联合或不联合咪达唑仑诱导深度镇静的安全性和疗效。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 2008 年 12 月至 2010 年 6 月期间计划行 ESD 的 135 例患者,并随机分为两组:丙泊酚组或联合组(丙泊酚加咪达唑仑)。
丙泊酚组仅报告 1 例严重低氧血症病例,无需面罩通气或插管。此外,丙泊酚组观察到 18 例轻度低血压,联合组观察到 11 例。联合组的平均总丙泊酚剂量较低(378mg 比 466mg,p<0.012),平均恢复时间较长(10.5 分钟比 7.9 分钟,p=0.027),总不良事件发生率较低(32.8%比 17.6%,p=0.042)。
在 ESD 期间,持续输注丙泊酚诱导的深度镇静是安全的。持续输注丙泊酚联合间断注射咪达唑仑可以减少丙泊酚的总剂量和输注速度,以及总不良事件的发生。