Suppr超能文献

依维莫司洗脱支架术后延长双联抗血小板治疗的获益与风险

Benefits and Risks of Extended Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Everolimus-Eluting Stents.

机构信息

St. Vincent Heart Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 25;9(2):138-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize outcomes for everolimus-eluting stent (EES)-treated subjects according to treatment with continued thienopyridine plus aspirin versus aspirin alone 12 to 30 months after stenting.

BACKGROUND

In the DAPT (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) study, continued thienopyridine plus aspirin beyond 1 year after coronary stenting reduced ischemic events. Given low rates of stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction (MI) for current drug-eluting stents, we examined outcomes among EES-treated subjects in the DAPT study.

METHODS

The DAPT study enrolled 25,682 subjects (11,308 EES-treated) after coronary stenting. Following 12 months of treatment with thienopyridine and aspirin, eligible subjects continued treatment with aspirin and 9,961 (4,703 with EES) were randomized to 18 months of continued thienopyridine or placebo. Stent type was not randomized, and the EES subset analysis was post hoc.

RESULTS

Among EES-treated patients, continued thienopyridine reduced stent thrombosis (0.3% vs. 0.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15 to 0.97; p = 0.04) and MI (2.1% vs. 3.2%, HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.91; p = 0.01) versus placebo but did not reduce a composite of death, MI, and stroke (4.3% vs. 4.5%, HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.18; p = 0.42), and increased moderate/severe bleeding (2.5% vs. 1.3%, HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.80; p = 0.01), and death (2.2% vs. 1.1%, HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.92; p = 0.02). Death due to cancer and not related to bleeding was increased (0.64% vs. 0.17%; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In EES-treated subjects, significant reductions in stent thrombosis and MI and an increase in bleeding were observed with continued thienopyridine beyond 1 year compared with aspirin alone. (The Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study [DAPT Study]); NCT00977938).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述在支架置入后 12 至 30 个月,依替巴肽联合阿司匹林组与单独应用阿司匹林组接受依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)治疗的患者结局。

背景

在 DAPT(双联抗血小板治疗)研究中,冠状动脉支架置入 1 年后继续应用噻吩吡啶联合阿司匹林可减少缺血事件。鉴于目前药物洗脱支架的支架血栓形成和心肌梗死(MI)发生率较低,我们对 DAPT 研究中 EES 治疗的患者进行了研究。

方法

DAPT 研究共纳入 25682 例患者(EES 治疗 11308 例),在接受 12 个月噻吩吡啶和阿司匹林治疗后,符合条件的患者继续应用阿司匹林治疗,其中 9961 例(EES 治疗 4703 例)随机接受 18 个月的噻吩吡啶或安慰剂治疗。支架类型未随机化,EES 亚组分析为事后分析。

结果

在 EES 治疗患者中,继续噻吩吡啶治疗可降低支架血栓形成(0.3%比 0.7%,风险比[HR]:0.38,95%置信区间[CI]:0.15 至 0.97;p = 0.04)和 MI(2.1%比 3.2%,HR:0.63,95%CI:0.44 至 0.91;p = 0.01),但不降低死亡、MI 和卒中复合终点(4.3%比 4.5%,HR:0.89,95%CI:0.67 至 1.18;p = 0.42),且增加中度/重度出血(2.5%比 1.3%,HR:1.79,95%CI:1.15 至 2.80;p = 0.01)和死亡(2.2%比 1.1%,HR:1.80,95%CI:1.11 至 2.92;p = 0.02)。癌症相关死亡而非与出血相关的死亡增加(0.64%比 0.17%;p = 0.01)。

结论

与单独应用阿司匹林相比,EES 治疗患者继续应用噻吩吡啶超过 1 年可显著降低支架血栓形成和 MI,且出血增加。(双联抗血小板治疗研究[DAPT 研究];NCT00977938)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验