• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China.

School of Chinese Materia Medica, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 138 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing 210023, China.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2021 May 5;2021:9934535. doi: 10.1155/2021/9934535. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/9934535
PMID:34035674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8118746/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPTs) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing longer-term (>12 months) DAPT (L-DAPT), 12-month DAPT (DAPT 12Mo), 6-month DAPT (DAPT 6Mo), 3-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy (DAPT 3Mo + ASA), 3-month DAPT followed by a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy (DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12), or 1-month DAPT with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy (DAPT 1Mo + P2Y12) were searched. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), major bleeding, any bleeding, definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), and net adverse clinical events (NACE). This Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed with the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-four RCTs ( = 81339) were included. In comparison with L-DAPT, DAPT 6Mo (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.29-0.83), DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12 (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.18-0.82), DAPT 3Mo + ASA (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.17-0.98), and DAPT 1Mo + P2Y12 (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.14-0.93) were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding. DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12 (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.88) reduced the risk of any bleeding when compared with DAPT 12Mo. L-DAPT decreased the risk of MI and definite or probable stent ST when compared with DAPT 6Mo. DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12 decreased the risk of NACE in comparison with DAPT 6Mo and DAPT 12Mo. No significant difference in all-cause mortality and cardiac death was observed. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, DAPT 6Mo was comparable to DAPT 12Mo.

CONCLUSION

Short-term (1-3 months) DAPT is noninferior to DAPT 6Mo after DESs implantation, while L-DAPT reduces MI and definite or probable ST rates. DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12 might be a reasonable trade-off in patients with high risk of bleeding accompanied by ischemia.

摘要

简介

本网络荟萃分析旨在评估药物洗脱支架(DES)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后不同双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索了比较长期(>12 个月)DAPT(L-DAPT)、12 个月 DAPT(DAPT 12Mo)、6 个月 DAPT(DAPT 6Mo)、3 个月 DAPT 后阿司匹林单药治疗(DAPT 3Mo+ASA)、3 个月 DAPT 后 P2Y12 受体抑制剂单药治疗(DAPT 3Mo+P2Y12)、或 1 个月 P2Y12 受体抑制剂单药治疗(DAPT 1Mo+P2Y12)的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要终点为全因死亡率、心脏死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、大出血、任何出血、明确或可能的支架血栓形成(ST)和净不良临床事件(NACE)。本贝叶斯网络荟萃分析采用随机效应模型进行。

结果

共纳入 24 项 RCT(n=81339)。与 L-DAPT 相比,DAPT 6Mo(OR:0.50,95%CI:0.29-0.83)、DAPT 3Mo+P2Y12(OR:0.38,95%CI:0.18-0.82)、DAPT 3Mo+ASA(OR:0.44,95%CI:0.17-0.98)和 DAPT 1Mo+P2Y12(OR:0.45,95%CI:0.14-0.93)与大出血风险降低相关。与 DAPT 12Mo 相比,DAPT 3Mo+P2Y12(OR:0.58,95%CI:0.38-0.88)降低了任何出血的风险。与 DAPT 6Mo 相比,L-DAPT 降低了 MI 和明确或可能的支架 ST 的风险。与 DAPT 6Mo 和 DAPT 12Mo 相比,DAPT 3Mo+P2Y12 降低了 NACE 的风险。全因死亡率和心脏死亡率无显著差异。在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,DAPT 6Mo 与 DAPT 12Mo 相当。

结论

DES 植入后短期(1-3 个月)DAPT 与 DAPT 6Mo 相当,而 L-DAPT 降低了 MI 和明确或可能的 ST 发生率。DAPT 3Mo+P2Y12 可能是伴有缺血的高出血风险患者的合理选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/20edf371f7d0/JITC2021-9934535.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/ed33a20af4b0/JITC2021-9934535.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/99236e9bed25/JITC2021-9934535.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/95417badba8b/JITC2021-9934535.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/20edf371f7d0/JITC2021-9934535.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/ed33a20af4b0/JITC2021-9934535.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/99236e9bed25/JITC2021-9934535.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/95417badba8b/JITC2021-9934535.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0709/8118746/20edf371f7d0/JITC2021-9934535.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 May 5;2021:9934535. doi: 10.1155/2021/9934535. eCollection 2021.
2
Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet regimens after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)使用药物洗脱支架后抗血小板治疗方案的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 May-Jun;63(3):243-248. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架置入术后的短期双联抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Dec 1;9(12):1094-1105. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216.
4
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后双联抗血小板治疗的时间:糖尿病与非糖尿病患者随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jan-Feb;60(4-5):500-507. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
5
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
6
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 20;23(9):4549. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094549.
7
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with CAD Undergoing Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.比较 CAD 患者接受药物洗脱支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(44):5739-5745. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200625110349.
8
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗的疗程:针对2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗疗程重点更新指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e156-78. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000405. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.吲哚布芬与阿司匹林用于老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的比较
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04843-0.
10
Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following drug-eluting stent implantation: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with longer follow up.药物洗脱支架植入术后双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间:一项随访时间更长的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;90(1):31-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27123. Epub 2017 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice.随机对照试验在指导临床实践中的比例。
Elife. 2022 Aug 17;11:e79491. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79491.
2
Coronary Artery Disease and Cancer: Treatment and Prognosis Regarding Gender Differences.冠状动脉疾病与癌症:关于性别差异的治疗与预后
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 16;14(2):434. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020434.

本文引用的文献

1
Ticagrelor alone vs. ticagrelor plus aspirin following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: TWILIGHT-ACS.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林用于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后:TWILIGHT-ACS研究
Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 1;41(37):3533-3545. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa670.
2
Prasugrel-based de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial.基于普拉格雷的急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗降级(HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS):一项开放标签、多中心、非劣效性随机试验。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1079-1089. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31791-8. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
4
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Drug-Eluting Stents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和药物洗脱支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 13;142(15):1425-1436. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046308. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Dual anti-thrombotic treatment with direct anticoagulants improves clinical outcomes in patients with Atrial Fibrillation with ACS or undergoing PCI. A systematic review and meta-analysis.双联抗栓治疗(直接抗凝剂)改善伴有 ACS 或接受 PCI 的房颤患者的临床结局。系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235511. eCollection 2020.
6
Benefit of dual antithrombotic therapy with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials.直接口服抗凝剂用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者的双重抗栓治疗的获益:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;15(6):1093-1104. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02402-3. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
8
Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulation strategies in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征的最佳抗血小板和抗凝策略
Herz. 2020 Sep;45(6):528-536. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-04947-7.
9
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Network Meta-Analysis of 52 816 Patients From 12 Randomized Trials.比较口服 P2Y 抑制剂在急性冠状动脉综合征中的疗效和安全性:来自 12 项随机试验的 52816 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):150-160. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046786. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
Double or triple antithrombotic therapy after coronary stenting and atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.双联或三联抗栓治疗在冠状动脉支架置入术后和心房颤动中的应用:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;302:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.054. Epub 2019 Dec 28.