Danthurebandara Vishva M, Vianna Jayme R, Sharpe Glen P, Hutchison Donna M, Belliveau Anne C, Shuba Lesya M, Nicolela Marcelo T, Chauhan Balwantray C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jan 1;57(1):181-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17820.
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional sector-based analysis with a method devised to detect the smallest localized neuroretinal rim and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) damage.
One eye of 151 glaucoma patients and 83 healthy controls (median age and MD, 71.7 and 66.7 years, and -3.6 and -0.3 dB, respectively) was imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) and RNFLT were determined at 1° intervals and also averaged for each sector. A classification of glaucoma was made with sectoral analysis when the sectoral value was below the 1%, 5%, or 10% normative limit (from an independent normative dataset); and with total analysis when a given number of measurements was below the 1%, 5%, or 10% normative limit.
With the 1% normative limit, BMO-MRW sectoral analysis yielded sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 92%; while at the same specificity (92%), total analysis yielded sensitivity of 88%. With RNFLT, sectoral analysis yielded sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 95%; while at the same specificity (95%), total analysis yielded sensitivity of 83%. The results for the 5% and 10% normative limits yielded lower specificity but higher sensitivity. In the whole glaucoma population, none of the sensitivity values of the sectoral and total analysis at the same specificities were statistically different.
The diagnostic accuracy of sectoral analysis was equivalent to total analysis. These results indicate that BMO-MRW and RNFLT defects were wide and deep enough for detection by conventional sectoral analysis.
比较传统扇形分析法与一种旨在检测最小局限性神经视网膜边缘和视网膜神经纤维层厚度(RNFLT)损伤的方法的诊断准确性。
对151例青光眼患者和83名健康对照者(年龄中位数和平均偏差分别为71.7岁和66.7岁,以及-3.6 dB和-0.3 dB)的一只眼睛进行了光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)成像。以1°间隔确定布鲁赫膜开口处最小边缘宽度(BMO-MRW)和RNFLT,并对每个扇形区域进行平均。当扇形区域值低于1%、5%或10%的正常范围界限(来自独立的正常数据集)时,采用扇形分析法进行青光眼分类;当给定数量的测量值低于1%、5%或10%的正常范围界限时,采用整体分析法进行分类。
以1%的正常范围界限为例,BMO-MRW扇形分析法的敏感性为87%,特异性为92%;而在相同特异性(92%)下,整体分析法的敏感性为88%。对于RNFLT,扇形分析法的敏感性为85%,特异性为95%;而在相同特异性(95%)下,整体分析法的敏感性为83%。5%和10%正常范围界限的结果显示特异性较低但敏感性较高。在整个青光眼人群中,相同特异性下扇形分析法和整体分析法的敏感性值均无统计学差异。
扇形分析法的诊断准确性与整体分析法相当。这些结果表明,BMO-MRW和RNFLT缺陷足够广泛和严重,可通过传统扇形分析法检测到。