Danthurebandara Vishva M, Sharpe Glen P, Hutchison Donna M, Denniss Jonathan, Nicolela Marcelo T, McKendrick Allison M, Turpin Andrew, Chauhan Balwantray C
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University and Capital Health District Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Dec 11;56(1):98-105. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15375.
To evaluate the structure-function relationship between disc margin-based rim area (DM-RA) obtained with confocal scanning laser tomography (CSLT), Bruch's membrane opening-based horizontal rim width (BMO-HRW), minimum rim width (BMO-MRW), peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and visual field sensitivity.
We examined 151 glaucoma patients with CSLT, SD-OCT, and standard automated perimetry on the same day. Optic nerve head (ONH) and RNFL with SD-OCT were acquired relative to a fixed coordinate system (acquired image frame [AIF]) and to the eye-specific fovea-BMO center (FoBMO) axis. Visual field locations were mapped to ONH and RNFL sectors with fixed Garway-Heath (VF(GH)) and patient-specific (VF(PS)) maps customized for various biometric parameters.
Globally and sectorally, the structure-function relationships between DM-RA and VF(GH), BMO-HRW(AIF) and VF(GH), and BMO-HRW(FoBMO) and VF(PS) were equally weak. The R(2) for the relationship between DM-RA and VF(GH) ranged from 0.1% (inferonasal) to 11% (superotemporal) whereas that between BMO-HRW(AIF) and VF(GH) ranged from 0.1% (nasal) to 10% (superotemporal). Relatively stronger global and sectoral structure-function relationships with BMO-MRW(AIF) and with BMO-MRW(FoBMO) were obtained. The R(2) between BMO-MRW(AIF) and VF(GH) ranged from 5% (nasal) to 30% (superotemporal), whereas that between BMO-MRW(FoBMO) and VF(PS) ranged from 5% (nasal) to 25% (inferotemporal). The structure-function relationship with RNFLT was not significantly different from that with BMO-MRW, regardless of image acquisition method.
The structure-function relationship was enhanced with BMO-MRW compared with the other neuroretinal rim measurements, due mainly to its geometrically accurate properties.
评估通过共焦扫描激光断层扫描(CSLT)获得的基于视盘边缘的边缘区域(DM-RA)、基于布鲁赫膜开口的水平边缘宽度(BMO-HRW)、最小边缘宽度(BMO-MRW)、通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)获得的视乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层厚度(RNFLT)与视野敏感度之间的结构-功能关系。
我们在同一天对151例青光眼患者进行了CSLT、SD-OCT和标准自动视野检查。相对于固定坐标系(采集图像框架[AIF])以及眼睛特定的黄斑-布鲁赫膜开口中心(FoBMO)轴,使用SD-OCT获取视神经乳头(ONH)和RNFL。使用针对各种生物测量参数定制的固定Garway-Heath(VF(GH))和患者特定(VF(PS))地图,将视野位置映射到ONH和RNFL扇区。
在整体和各个扇区中,DM-RA与VF(GH)、BMO-HRW(AIF)与VF(GH)以及BMO-HRW(FoBMO)与VF(PS)之间的结构-功能关系同样较弱。DM-RA与VF(GH)之间关系的R²范围从0.1%(鼻下)到11%(颞上),而BMO-HRW(AIF)与VF(GH)之间的R²范围从0.1%(鼻侧)到10%(颞上)。与BMO-MRW(AIF)和BMO-MRW(FoBMO)获得了相对较强的整体和扇区结构-功能关系。BMO-MRW(AIF)与VF(GH)之间的R²范围从5%(鼻侧)到30%(颞上),而BMO-MRW(FoBMO)与VF(PS)之间的R²范围从5%(鼻侧)到25%(颞下)。无论图像采集方法如何,与RNFLT的结构-功能关系与与BMO-MRW的关系无显著差异。
与其他神经视网膜边缘测量相比,BMO-MRW增强了结构-功能关系,这主要归因于其几何精确特性。