• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚焦椎间盘损伤可能性量表(DDLS)。

Spotlight on the Disc-Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS).

作者信息

Cheng Kelvin K W, Tatham Andrew J

机构信息

Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 7;15:4059-4071. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S284618. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S284618
PMID:34675474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8504474/
Abstract

The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) is a tool for classifying glaucomatous structural changes to the optic disc based on the radial width of the neuroretinal rim at its thinnest location, or if no rim is present, the extent of absence of the rim. Unlike cup disc ratio (CDR), the DDLS also considers disc size. Twenty years after its first description, the aim of this review was to critically appraise evidence for the DDLS and evaluate its role in current practice. A literature search by two independent authors identified 33 relevant articles for inclusion. Five studies evaluated reproducibility, 5 diagnostic performance, and 2 studies examined ability to detect progression. Eleven studies evaluated correlation between DDLS and other markers of glaucoma. Despite the widespread availability of imaging devices such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), clinical examination of the optic disc remains an essential component of glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring. The DDLS provides a reliable method for semi-quantitative clinical grading of the optic disc in glaucoma, with higher reproducibility than methods such as CDR.

摘要

视盘损伤可能性量表(DDLS)是一种根据神经视网膜边缘最薄处的径向宽度,或在不存在边缘的情况下,边缘缺失的程度,对视盘的青光眼性结构变化进行分类的工具。与杯盘比(CDR)不同,DDLS还考虑了视盘大小。在其首次描述二十年后,本综述的目的是批判性地评估DDLS的证据,并评估其在当前实践中的作用。两位独立作者进行的文献检索确定了33篇相关文章以供纳入。五项研究评估了可重复性,五项评估了诊断性能,两项研究考察了检测进展的能力。十一项研究评估了DDLS与青光眼其他标志物之间的相关性。尽管光学相干断层扫描(OCT)等成像设备已广泛应用,但对视盘的临床检查仍然是青光眼诊断和监测的重要组成部分。DDLS为青光眼视盘的半定量临床分级提供了一种可靠的方法,其可重复性高于CDR等方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a6d/8504474/002fe93a90d7/OPTH-15-4059-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a6d/8504474/0ceb96a73142/OPTH-15-4059-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a6d/8504474/002fe93a90d7/OPTH-15-4059-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a6d/8504474/0ceb96a73142/OPTH-15-4059-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a6d/8504474/002fe93a90d7/OPTH-15-4059-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Spotlight on the Disc-Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS).聚焦椎间盘损伤可能性量表(DDLS)。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 7;15:4059-4071. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S284618. eCollection 2021.
2
The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS): interobserver agreement of a new grading system to assess glaucomatous optic disc damage.椎间盘损伤可能性量表(DDLS):一种用于评估青光眼性视盘损伤的新分级系统的观察者间一致性。
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009 Apr;226(4):280-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109288. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
3
DDLSNet: A Novel Deep Learning-Based System for Grading Funduscopic Images for Glaucomatous Damage.DDLSNet:一种基于深度学习的用于青光眼性损伤眼底图像分级的新型系统。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Nov 12;3(2):100255. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100255. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
RimNet: A Deep Neural Network Pipeline for Automated Identification of the Optic Disc Rim.RimNet:用于自动识别视盘边缘的深度神经网络管道
Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Nov 3;3(1):100244. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100244. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.椎间盘损伤可能性量表:一种估算青光眼所致视神经损伤程度新方法的可重复性。
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:181-5; discussion 185-6.
6
The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry.椎间盘损伤可能性量表:诊断准确性及其与杯盘比、结构测试和标准自动视野计的相关性
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181428. eCollection 2017.
7
Estimation of the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale in primary open-angle glaucoma: the Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study.原发性开角型青光眼盘损伤可能性量表的评估:青光眼立体分析研究
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;254(3):523-8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3239-0. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
8
Assessment of optic disk by disk damage likelihood scale staging using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma.使用裂隙灯生物显微镜和光学相干断层扫描对盘损伤可能性分级评估诊断原发性开角型青光眼的视盘。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4152-4157. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1113_22.
9
Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma.在青光眼诊断中,盘损伤可能性量表、杯盘比与海德堡视网膜断层扫描的比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;90(4):437-41. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.077131.
10
A comparative study of two methods of optic disc evaluation in patients of glaucoma.青光眼患者两种视盘评估方法的比较研究
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2013 May;6(2):103-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.116643.

引用本文的文献

1
Inflammation and Neurodegeneration in Glaucoma: Isolated Eye Disease or a Part of a Systemic Disorder? - Serum Proteomic Analysis.青光眼的炎症与神经退行性变:孤立性眼病还是全身性疾病的一部分?——血清蛋白质组学分析
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Feb 13;17:1021-1037. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S434989. eCollection 2024.
2
DDLSNet: A Novel Deep Learning-Based System for Grading Funduscopic Images for Glaucomatous Damage.DDLSNet:一种基于深度学习的用于青光眼性损伤眼底图像分级的新型系统。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Nov 12;3(2):100255. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100255. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
A Comprehensive Review of Methods and Equipment for Aiding Automatic Glaucoma Tracking.

本文引用的文献

1
European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition.欧洲青光眼学会青光眼术语和指南,第 5 版。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;105(Suppl 1):1-169. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines.
2
Results of a Glaucoma Shared Care Model Using the Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System and Disc Damage Likelihood Scale with a Novel Scoring Scheme in New Zealand.在新西兰采用强化青光眼分期系统和视盘损伤可能性量表以及新型评分方案的青光眼共享照护模式的结果。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 7;15:57-63. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S285966. eCollection 2021.
3
Automatic glaucoma screening using optic nerve head measurements and random forest classifier on fundus images.
青光眼自动跟踪辅助方法与设备的综合综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 8;12(4):935. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040935.
利用视盘测量和随机森林分类器对眼底图像进行青光眼自动筛查。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2020 Dec;43(4):1265-1277. doi: 10.1007/s13246-020-00930-y. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
The role of the disc damage likelihood scale in glaucoma detection by community optometrists.盘损伤可能性量表在社区验光师检测青光眼中的作用。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 Nov;40(6):752-759. doi: 10.1111/opo.12734. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
A neuroglia-based interpretation of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim thinning in the optic nerve head.基于神经胶质的视神经头青光眼性神经视网膜边缘变薄的解释。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020 Jul;77:100840. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100840. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
Rim-to-Disc Ratio Outperforms Cup-to-Disc Ratio for Glaucoma Prescreening.边缘到盘比优于杯盘比用于青光眼初筛。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 8;9(1):7099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43385-2.
7
The impact of SIGN glaucoma guidelines on false-positive referrals from community optometrists in Central Scotland.苏格兰中部社区验光师转诊中 SIGN 青光眼指南的影响。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;103(3):369-373. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311429. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Evaluation of two-dimensional Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim area for glaucoma diagnostics in a large patient cohort.大样本患者群体中二维 Bruch 膜开口最小边缘区域在青光眼诊断中的评估。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;97(1):60-67. doi: 10.1111/aos.13698. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
9
The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry.椎间盘损伤可能性量表:诊断准确性及其与杯盘比、结构测试和标准自动视野计的相关性
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181428. eCollection 2017.
10
Correlation between Visual Field Index and Other Functional and Structural Measures in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects.青光眼患者及疑似患者视野指数与其他功能和结构指标之间的相关性
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;12(1):53-57. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_98_16.