Crossland Lisa, Askew Deborah, Ware Robert, Cranstoun Peter, Mitchell Paul, Bryett Andrew, Jackson Claire
Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Level 8, Health Sciences Building, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Level 2, Public Health Building, Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:8405395. doi: 10.1155/2016/8405395. Epub 2015 Dec 20.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in Australia. Up to 50% of people with proliferative DR who do not receive timely treatment will become legally blind within five years. Innovative and accessible screening, involving a variety of primary care providers, will become increasingly important if patients with diabetes are to receive optimal eye care.
An open controlled trial design was used. Five intervention practices in urban, regional, and rural Australia partnered with ophthalmologists via telehealth undertook DR screening and monitoring of type 2 diabetes patients and were compared with control practices undertaking usual care 2011-2014.
Recorded screening rates were 100% across intervention practices, compared with 22-53% in control practices. 31/577 (5%) of patients in the control practices were diagnosed with mild-moderate DR, of whom 9 (29%) had appropriate follow-up recorded. This was compared with 39/447 (9%) of patients in the intervention group, of whom 37 (95%) had appropriate follow-up recorded.
General practice-based DR screening via Annual Cycle of Care arrangements is effective across differing practice locations. It offers improved recording of screening outcomes for Australians with type 2 diabetes and better follow-up of those with screen abnormalities.
糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是澳大利亚可预防失明的主要原因。高达50%未得到及时治疗的增殖性DR患者将在五年内失明。如果糖尿病患者要获得最佳眼部护理,由各类初级保健提供者参与的创新且可及的筛查将变得愈发重要。
采用开放对照试验设计。2011年至2014年期间,澳大利亚城市、地区和农村的五家干预医疗机构通过远程医疗与眼科医生合作,对2型糖尿病患者进行DR筛查和监测,并与进行常规护理的对照医疗机构进行比较。
干预医疗机构的筛查记录率为100%,而对照医疗机构为22% - 53%。对照医疗机构中577名患者中有31名(5%)被诊断为轻度至中度DR,其中9名(29%)有适当的后续记录。相比之下,干预组447名患者中有39名(9%)被诊断为此病,其中37名(95%)有适当的后续记录。
通过年度护理周期安排进行基于全科医疗的DR筛查在不同医疗机构地点均有效。它能改善澳大利亚2型糖尿病患者筛查结果的记录,并对筛查异常者进行更好的后续跟踪。